You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 5, May 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

The mechanism of venous valve closure. Its relationship to the velocity of reverse flow

P. S. van Bemmelen, K. Beach, G. Bedford and D. E. Strandness Jr
Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle 98195.

Venous valves will close when the reversal of the normal pressure gradient generates a sufficient reverse flow velocity. By testing 20 healthy subjects with ultrasonic duplex scanning and controlled limb compression. It was found that the velocity of reflux is related to the external compression pressure. Valve closure is an abrupt cessation of reverse flow. In this study, with subjects in a supine position, valve closure was achieved only after reverse velocities exceeded 30 cm/s. This velocity was not generated by manual compression of the limb. With a Valsalva maneuver, this velocity is achieved only in the common femoral vein in 90% of the tested individuals. The reflux velocities in response to a Valsalva maneuver are progressively lower in more distal veins--the profunda femoris, the superficial femoral vein, and the popliteal vein. With reverse velocities lower than 30 cm/s, the valves will not close and reflux can persist. Valsalva's maneuver only allows a diagnosis of valvular competence at the most proximal level in the venous tree.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Evaluation of chronic venous disease in the lower limbs: comparison of five diagnostic methods
Mantoni et al.
Br. J. Radiol. 2002;75:578-583.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.