You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 6, June 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 70TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE NEW ENGLAND SURGICAL SOCIETY, BRETTON WOODS, NH, SEPTEMBER 22 TO SEPTEMBER 24, 1989
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Clinical and Pathologic Correlations in Patients With Periampullary Tumors

F. Maureen Martin, MD; Ricardo L. Rossi, MD; Vittorio Dorrucci, MD; Mark L. Silverman, MD; John W. Braasch, MD

Arch Surg. 1990;125(6):723-726.


Abstract

• Perioperative data on 87 patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors were correlated with pathologic study of operative specimens to identify the accuracy of diagnosis and the factors affecting survival. Accuracy of endoscopie retrograde cholangiopancreatography and computed tomography in locating lesions was 75% and 44%, respectively. Histologie diagnosis before or at the time of resection was available in only 61% of the patients. Carcinoma was correctly diagnosed clinically by the pathologist or the surgeon in 95% (83/87) of patients with 4 patients found to have benign disease on final pathologic examination. Intraoperative diagnosis of site of origin was incorrect in 18% (16/87) of patients. In 28% (23/83) of patients, pathologists identified nodal metastatic disease missed by the surgeon. Survival correlated with nodal and margin status and tumor grade. Tumor size demonstrated no predictive capacity. Although preoperative diagnostic accuracy is less than optimal, surgeons can usually diagnose malignant lesions but more often fail to identify tumor origin and nodal disease. We continue to advocate resection for patients with periampullary lesions thought to be malignant and resectable without a positive histologie diagnosis.

(Arch Surg. 1990;125:723-726)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery (Drs Martin, Rossi, Dorrucci, and Braasch) and Pathology (Dr Silverman), Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, Mass.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 28, 1990.

Read before the 70th Annual Meeting of the New England Surgical Society, Bretton Woods, NH, September 23, 1989.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, Lahey Clinic Medical Center, 41 Mall Rd, Burlington, MA 01805 (Dr Rossi).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Prognostic value of Bax, Bcl-2, p53, and TUNEL staining in patients with radically resected ampullary carcinoma
Santini et al.
J. Clin. Pathol. 2005;58:159-165.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tumor of the Ampulla of Vater: Experience With Local or Radical Resection in 171 Consecutively Treated Patients
Beger et al.
Arch Surg 1999;134:526-532.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Observations on the Developmental Patterns and the Consequences of Pancreatic Exocrine Adenocarcinoma: Findings of 154 Autopsies
Mao et al.
Arch Surg 1995;130:125-134.
ABSTRACT  

Pylorus-Preserving Pancreatoduodenectomy: Is It an Adequate Cancer Operation?
Tsao et al.
Arch Surg 1994;129:405-412.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.