This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Results, Advantages, and Unanswered Questions

Mary M. Olson, RN; James T. Lee, Jr, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 1990;125(6):794-803.

Abstract
• During a 10-year wound infection surveillance program, 1032 wound infections complicated 40 915 operations. Surveillance continued for 30 days postoperatively, and rigid clinical criteria for diagnosis were honored. Operations were distributed unequally among infection risk classes: clean (class I), 63.3%; clean contaminated (class II), 26.4%; and contaminated (class III) 10.3%. Infections occurred with nearly equal frequencies among classes: I, 36.1%; II, 29.5%; and III, 34.4%. Wound infection rates during the 10-year period were 2.5% (all operations), 1.4% (class I), 2.8% (class II), and 8.4% (class III). Index year (1977) infection rates were 4.2% (all operations), 2.3% (class I), 5.4% (class II), and 12.8% (class III). Wound infection rates during the last 9 years of surveillance in every risk class were significantly less than index year rates, representing infection rate decreases of 38% to 56%. Estimated savings in hospital room costs alone reached $3 million during 10 years.

(Arch Surg. 1990;125:794-803)

Author Affiliations
From the Surgical Service, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minn.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication January 4, 1990.

Reprint requests to Surgical Service, 112 Veterans Administration Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN 55417 (Ms Olson).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Reduced risk of surgical site infections through surveillance in a network
Geubbels et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2006;18:127-133.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hand-Rubbing With an Aqueous Alcoholic Solution vs Traditional Surgical Hand-Scrubbing and 30-Day Surgical Site Infection Rates: A Randomized Equivalence Study
Parienti et al.
JAMA 2002;288:722-727.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of active monitoring of infection control practices on deep sternal infection after open-heart surgery
Borer et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2001;72:515-520.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Epidemiology and Microbiology of Surgical Wound Infections
Giacometti et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000;38:918-922.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Six Years of Surgical Wound Infection Surveillance at a Tertiary Care Center: Review of the Microbiologic and Epidemiological Aspects of 20,007 Wounds
Weiss III et al.
Arch Surg 1999;134:1041-1048.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Direct Observations of Surgical Wound Infections at a Comprehensive Cancer Center
Barber et al.
Arch Surg 1995;130:1042-1047.
ABSTRACT  

The Necessity and Efficiency of Wound Surveillance After Discharge
Weigelt et al.
Arch Surg 1992;127:77-82.
ABSTRACT  

Retrospect and Prospect: Ruminations After the First Decade of the Surgical Infection Society
Condon
Arch Surg 1991;126:19-22.
ABSTRACT