You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 7, July 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 97TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE WESTERN SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, ST LOUIS, MO, NOVEMBER 14 TO NOVEMBER 15, 1989-PA RT I
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cervical Esophageal Trauma

Incidence and Cause of Esophageal Fistulas

Robert P. Winter, MD; John A. Weigelt, MD

Arch Surg. 1990;125(7):849-852.


Abstract



• Esophageal fistulas occurred in 4 (9%) of 46 penetrating esophageal wounds. All four patients with fistulas were victims of gunshot wounds, presented in shock, and underwent an urgent tracheostomy in the emergency department. Shock and urgent tracheostomy were significantly associated with fistula formation. Whether single-layer closures are adequate for esophageal wounds remains unanswered. Our data showed no disadvantage to single-layer closure, since seven of eight were successful. This compares with a success rate for multilayer closures of 32 of 35. Fifty percent of the esophageal fistulas were asymptomatic and were discovered on routine postoperative contrast study. All fistulas closed with nonoperative management. Management recommendations included nonoperative means to establish an airway, meticulous débridement, two-layer closure of the wound, closed-suction drainage, and postoperative esophagography before drain removal.

(Arch Surg. 1990;125:849-852)



Author Affiliations



From the Section of Surgical Critical Care and Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication April 20, 1989.

Read before the 97th Annual Meeting of the Western Surgical Association, St Louis, Mo, November 14, 1989.

Reprint requests to the Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75235-9031 (Dr Weigelt).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Physical Examination and Arteriography in Patients With Penetrating Zone II Neck Wounds
Beitsch et al.
Arch Surg 1994;129:577-581.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.