You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 7, July 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Cervical esophageal trauma. Incidence and cause of esophageal fistulas

R. P. Winter and J. A. Weigelt
Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75235-9031.

Esophageal fistulas occurred in 4 (9%) of 46 penetrating esophageal wounds. All four patients with fistulas were victims of gunshot wounds, presented in shock, and underwent an urgent tracheostomy in the emergency department. Shock and urgent tracheostomy were significantly associated with fistula formation. Whether single-layer closures are adequate for esophageal wounds remains unanswered. Our data showed no disadvantage to single-layer closure, since seven of eight were successful. This compares with a success rate for multilayer closures of 32 of 35. Fifty percent of the esophageal fistulas were asymptomatic and were discovered on routine postoperative contrast study. All fistulas closed with nonoperative management. Management recommendations included nonoperative means to establish an airway, meticulous debridement, two-layer closure of the wound, closed-suction drainage, and postoperative esophagography before drain removal.





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.