You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 7, July 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Accuracy of combined clinical-mammographic-cytologic diagnosis of dominant breast masses. A prospective study

J. A. Butler, H. I. Vargas, N. Worthen and S. E. Wilson
Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance 90502.

Excisional biopsy is considered a mandatory part of the workup for patients with dominant breast masses. To evaluate the efficacy of a combined physical, mammographic, and fine-needle aspiration cytologic examination, 113 women were prospectively evaluated. Breast masses were listed as either benign or suspicious/malignant. All patients underwent a subsequent biopsy. Fifty-two (46%) of 113 patients had a malignant mass. The sensitivity and specificity of the individual tests were as follows: 96% and 66% for the physical examination; 94% and 73% for the mammographic examination; 90% and 93% for the fine-needle aspiration cytologic examination. For the 86 patients who underwent all three studies, the 25 patients with benign test results on all three examinations had a benign pathologic result. One (6%) of 18 patients with a single suspicious/malignant test result had cancer, 9 (64%) of 14 patients with two suspicious/malignant test results and 28 (97%) of 29 patients with three suspicious/malignant results also had breast cancer. We conclude that the combined triad of physical, mammographic, and fine-needle aspiration cytologic examinations is highly accurate in the diagnosis of breast masses, and patients in whom all three examination results are benign can be safely observed, obviating the need for an open biopsy.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Does This Patient Have Breast Cancer?: The Screening Clinical Breast Examination: Should It Be Done? How?
Barton et al.
JAMA 1999;282:1270-1280.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Accurate Evaluation of Palpable Breast Masses by the Triple Test Score
Morris et al.
Arch Surg 1998;133:930-934.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.