This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (29)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A Prospective Study

John A. Butler, MD; Hernan I. Vargas, MD; Nancy Worthen, MD; Samuel E. Wilson, MD

Arch Surg. 1990;125(7):893-896.

Abstract
• Excisional biopsy is considered a mandatory part of the workup for patients with dominant breast masses. To evaluate the efficacy of a combined physical, mammographic, and fineneedle aspiration cytologic examination, 113 women were prospectively evaluated. Breast masses were listed as either benign or suspicious/malignant. All patients underwent a subsequent biopsy. Fifty-two (46%) of 113 patients had a malignant mass. The sensitivity and specificity of the individual tests were as follows: 96% and 66% for the physical examination; 94% and 73% for the mammographic examination; 90% and 93% for the fine-needle aspiration cytologic examination. For the 86 patients who underwent all three studies, the 25 patients with benign test results on all three examinations had a benign pathologic result. One (6%) of 18 patients with a single suspicious/malignant test result had cancer, 9(64%) of 14 patients with two suspicious/malignant test results and 28 (97%) of 29 patients with three suspicious/malignant results also had breast cancer. We conclude that the combined triad of physical, mammographic, and fine-needle aspiration cytologic examinations is highly accurate in the diagnosis of breast masses, and patients in whom all three examination results are benign can be safely observed, obviating the need for an open biopsy.

(Arch Surg. 1990;125:893-896)

Author Affiliations
From the Departments of Surgery (Drs Butler, Vargas, and Wilson) and Radiology (Dr Worthen), Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, Calif.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication March 19, 1990.

Read before the 97th Annual Meeting of the Western Surgical Association, St Louis, Mo, November 15, 1989.

Reprint requests to the Department of Surgery, PO Box 25, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, 1000 W Carson St, Torrance, CA 90502 (Dr Butler).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Does This Patient Have Breast Cancer?: The Screening Clinical Breast Examination: Should It Be Done? How?
Barton et al.
JAMA 1999;282:1270-1280.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Accurate Evaluation of Palpable Breast Masses by the Triple Test Score
Morris et al.
Arch Surg 1998;133:930-934.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT