You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 8, August 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 97TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE WESTERN SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, ST LOUIS, MO, NOVEMBER 14 TO NOVEMBER 15, 1989-PAR T II
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (29)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Clinical Use of 24-Hour Gastric pH Monitoring vs O-diisopropyl Iminodiacetic Acid (DISIDA) Scanning in the Diagnosis of Pathologic Duodenogastric Reflux

Hubert J. Stein, MD; Ronald A. Hinder, MD, PhD; Tom R. DeMeester, MD; Beth-Anne Lloyd, MD; Karl H. Fuchs, MD; Stephen E. A. Attwood, MD; Naresh C. Gupta, MD

Arch Surg. 1990;125(8):966-971.


Abstract

• The efficacy of o-diisopropyl iminodiacetic acid (DISIDA) scanning was compared with that of computerized analysis of 24-hour gastric pH monitoring to diagnose excessive duodenogastric reflux in 22 normal volunteers and 106 consecutive patients with foregut symptoms. DISIDA scanning had a false-positive rate of 18% in the normal volunteers. Gastric pH monitoring showed an increasing prevalence of duodenogastric reflux in patients with increasing clinical evidence of this condition, which was not seen with DISIDA scanning. Both DISIDA scanning and gastric pH monitoring identified duodenogastric reflux in most patients who had had previous pyloroplasty or antrectomy. Only gastric pH monitoring, however, showed a significantly increased prevalence of duodenogastric reflux in symptomatic patients after previous cholecystectomy compared with those who had not undergone previous surgery. These data suggest that 24-hour gastric pH monitoring is superior to DISIDA scanning in identifying duodenogastric reflux as a cause of foregut symptoms.

(Arch Surg. 1990;125:966-971)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery (Drs Stein, Hinder, DeMeester, Fuchs, and Atwood, and Ms Lloyd) and Radiology (Dr Gupta), School of Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, Neb.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 17, 1990.

Read before the 97th Annual Meeting of the Western Surgical Association, St Louis, Mo, November 14, 1989.

Reprint requests to the Department of Surgery, Suite 3740, 601 N 30th St, Omaha, NE 68131 (Dr Hinder).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Indications, Principles of Procedure Selection, and Technique of Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication
Peters and DeMeester
SURG INNOV 1995;2:27-44.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.