You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 10, October 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE 62ND ANNUAL MEETING OF THE PACIFIC COAST SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, PEBBLE BEACH, CALIF, FEBRUARY 18, 1991
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Effect of Donor-Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation in Liver Transplantation

Stephen S. Cheng, MD; C. Wright Pinson, MD; Richard R. Lopez, MD; Richard A. Crass, MD; Roderick S. Johnson, MD

Arch Surg. 1991;126(10):1292-1296.


Abstract

• It is not known whether disseminated intravascular coagulation, present in a large percentage of organ donors, affects patient outcome after liver transplantation. We reviewed our first 55 liver transplantations and identified 10 donors with disseminated intravascular coagulation. We compared the perioperative courses of the 10 recipients of these transplanted livers with those of 10 matched controls whose donors did not have disseminated intravascular coagulation. Disseminated intravascular coagulation recipients did not require more blood products during or after surgery; their hepatic enzyme levels and prothrombin times after surgery were not statistically significantly higher than those of the controls. There was no difference in hospital stay, number of episodes of rejection, retransplantations, or deaths. The presence of disseminated intravascular coagulation in donors did not adversely affect graft function or patient outcome and should not be a sole criterion for rejecting a liver for transplantation.

(Arch Surg. 1991;126:1292-1296)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery (Drs Cheng and Crass) and Clinical Pathology (Dr Johnson), Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland; Portland (Ore) Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Drs Cheng, Crass, and Johnson); and the Department of Surgery (Drs Pinson and Lopez), Vanderbilt University Medical School, Nashville, Tenn.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 17, 1991.

Presented at the 62nd Annual Scientific Session of the Pacific Coast Surgical Association, Pebble Beach, Calif, February 20, 1991.

Reprint requests to Vanderbilt University Transplant Center, Oxford House, Suite 909, Nashville, TN 37232-4753 (Dr Pinson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.