You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 11, November 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Effect of the Angelchik Prosthesis on Esophageal and Gastric Function

Guy J. Maddern, MBBS, PhD, FRACS; Jennifer C. Myers; Neil McIntosh, MBBS, FRACS; Franklin H. G. Bridgewater, MBBS, FRACS, FRCS; Glyn G. Jamieson, MD

Arch Surg. 1991;126(11):1418-1422.


Abstract

• The effects of the Angelchik prosthesis on esophageal and gastric function were investigated in 17 patients (11 men and six women; median age, 57 years; age range, 36 to 88 years) who underwent surgery for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. All patients demonstrated unequivocal reflux, either at endoscopy or 24-hour pH testing. There was a significant increase in lower esophageal sphincter pressure after surgery, and no patient demonstrated abnormal reflux on pH testing. Gastric emptying of liquids and solids was not altered by surgery. Six months after surgery, all symptoms except dysphagia had significantly improved. Thirty-three months after surgery, six patients described symptoms as severe as or worse than those before surgery. Four patients had the prosthesis removed, two because of dysphagia alone, one because of reflux and dysphagia, and one because of flatulence and bloating. The patients who required removal of the prosthesis because of dysphagia had gross delay of esophageal emptying. We conclude that the Angelchik prosthesis is an effective antireflux device, but it interferes with esophageal function in some patients, requiring removal of the prosthesis. We think the rate of removal of the prosthesis is too high for its routine use in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

(Arch Surg. 1991;126:1418-1422)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital (Drs Maddern and Jamieson and Ms Myers); Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Center (Dr McIntosh); and Division of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital (Dr Bridgewater), Adelaide, Australia.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication June 15, 1991.

Reprint requests to the Department of Surgery, University of Adelaide, GPO Box 498, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia 5000 (Dr Jamieson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Antireflux Surgery Enhances Gastric Emptying
Viljakka et al.
Arch Surg 1999;134:18-21.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Antireflux Prosthesis
ANGELCHIK
Arch Surg 1992;127:867-867.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.