You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 12, December 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE 44TH ANNUAL CANCER SYMPOSIUM OF THE SOCIETY OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (12)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Extremity Epithelioid Sarcoma

Amputation vs Local Resection

Pat W. Whitworth, MD; Raphael E. Pollock, MD, PhD; Paul F. Mansfield, MD; Jean Couture, MD; Marvin M. Romsdahl, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 1991;126(12):1485-1489.


Abstract

• Amputation has traditionally been advised for extremity epithelioid sarcoma because of its pattern of innocuous presentation and relentless soft-tissue and nodal metastasis. To assess the role of amputation in extremity epithelioid sarcoma, we reviewed our experience with 42 patients treated between 1961 and 1986. On presentation with localized primary tumor (n = 18), nine of 11 patients who underwent wide local excision and four of six patients who underwent excisional biopsy were free of disease, and one patient who underwent amputation died. After presentation with localized recurrence (n = 12), four of six patients who underwent wide local excision and two patients who underwent excisional biopsy were free of disease; three other patients who underwent wide local excision had margins that tested positive on pathologic examination, of whom one was free of disease; one patient who underwent amputation died of disease. On presentation with regional metastasis (n = 12), only one of five patients who underwent wide local excision and one of seven patients who underwent amputation were free of disease. Primary amputation offered no apparent overall survival benefit to patients presenting with regional metastasis. The favorable outcome after local resections for localized disease indicates that wide local excision with margins that test negative on pathologic examination is preferable to radical amputation in these patients.

(Arch Surg. 1991;126:1485-1489)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of General Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. Dr Whitworth is now with the Departments of General Surgery, Baptist Hospital, Nashville, Tenn, and Centennial Medical Center, Nashville.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication August 31, 1991.

Presented at the 44th Annual Cancer Symposium of the Society of Surgical Oncology, Orlando, Fla, March 26, 1991.

Reprint request to Department of Surgery, Box 106, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77036 (Dr Pollock).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.