You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 4, April 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 43RD ANNUAL CANCER SYMPOSIUM OF THE SOCIETY OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, WASHINGTON, DC, MAY 19 TO 22, 1990-PAR T II
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (224)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Narrow Excision (1-cm Margin)

A Safe Procedure for Thin Cutaneous Melanoma

Umberto Veronesi; Natale Cascinelli, MD

Arch Surg. 1991;126(4):438-441.


Abstract

• We analyzed the results at 8 years of an international, randomized, prospective study carried out by the World Health Organization Melanoma Programme aimed at evaluating the efficacy of 1-cm-margin excision of primary melanomas not thicker than 2 mm. Data for 612 patients were assessable; 305 were randomized to receive 1-cm-margin excision and 307 to receive wide excision (margins of ≤3 cm). The major prognostic criteria were similar in the two groups. Breslow thickness was 0.99 mm in the narrow excision group and 1.02 mm in the wide excision group. Disease-free and overall survival rates (mean follow-up period, 90 months) were similar in the two groups. Only four patients had a local recurrence as a first relapse. All underwent narrow excision, and each had primary melanomas thicker than 1 mm.

(Arch Surg. 1991;126:438-441)



Author Affiliations

From the World Health Organization Melanoma Programme, National Tumor Institute, Milan, Italy.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication November 23, 1990.

Read before the 43rd Annual Cancer Symposium of the Society of Surgical Oncology, Washington, DC, May 20, 1990.

Reprint requests to Division of Surgical Oncology "B," Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Via Venezian, 1, 20133 Milano, Italy (Dr Cascinelli).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Melanoma--Part 2: management
Thirlwell and Nathan
BMJ 2008;337:a2488-a2488.
FULL TEXT  

Microscopic Tumor Burden in Sentinel Lymph Nodes Predicts Synchronous Nonsentinel Lymph Node Involvement in Patients With Melanoma
Gershenwald et al.
JCO 2008;26:4296-4303.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Variations in Management of Stage I to Stage III Cutaneous Melanoma: A Population-Based Study of Clinical Practices in France
Grange et al.
Arch Dermatol 2008;144:629-636.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Excision Margins for Primary Cutaneous Melanoma: Updated Pooled Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Lens et al.
Arch Surg 2007;142:885-891.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Melanoma Outcomes for Medicare Patients: Association of Stage and Survival With Detection by a Dermatologist vs a Nondermatologist
Pennie et al.
Arch Dermatol 2007;143:488-494.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Case 2-2007 -- A 49-Year-Old Woman with a Pigmented Lesion on the Arm
Thompson et al.
NEJM 2007;356:285-292.
FULL TEXT  

Surgical Margins for Lentigo Maligna and Lentigo Maligna Melanoma: The Technique of Mapped Serial Excision
Huilgol et al.
Arch Dermatol 2004;140:1087-1092.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Melanoma Margins: The Importance and Need for More Evidence-Based Trials
Johnson and Sondak
Arch Dermatol 2004;140:1148-1150.
FULL TEXT  

Excision Margins in the Treatment of Primary Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Narrow vs Wide Excision
Lens et al.
Arch Surg 2002;137:1101-1105.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Melanoma Information on the Internet: Often Incomplete--A Public Health Opportunity?
Bichakjian et al.
JCO 2002;20:134-141.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment of Head and Neck Melanoma, Lentigo Maligna Subtype: A Practical Surgical Technique
Anderson et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2001;3:202-206.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment of Primary Cutaneous Melanoma
Kanzler and Mraz-Gernhard
JAMA 2001;285:1819-1821.
FULL TEXT  

Multi-Institutional Melanoma Lymphatic Mapping Experience: The Prognostic Value of Sentinel Lymph Node Status in 612 Stage I or II Melanoma Patients
Gershenwald et al.
JCO 1999;17:976-976.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Resection Margins in Primary Cutaneous Melanoma
Weinstock
Arch Dermatol 1997;133:103-103.
ABSTRACT  

Revising the Practice of Melanoma Margin Resections-Reply
Piepkorn
Arch Dermatol 1997;133:104-105.
ABSTRACT  

A Factual, Not Arbitrary, Basis for Choice of Resection Margins in Melanoma
Piepkorn and Barnhill
Arch Dermatol 1996;132:811-814.
ABSTRACT  

Minimal-Access Surgery for Staging of Malignant Melanoma
Krag et al.
Arch Surg 1995;130:654-658.
ABSTRACT  

Melanoma in Children
Ceballos et al.
NEJM 1995;332:656-662.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.