Touch preparation cytology of breast lumpectomy margins with histologic correlation
C. E. Cox, N. N. Ku, D. S. Reintgen, H. M. Greenberg, S. V. Nicosia and S. Wangensteen
Department of Surgery, University of South Florida Health Sciences Center, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa 33682-0179.
Residual microscopic disease after lumpectomy for breast cancer may cause
significant local recurrence. We evaluated one hundred fourteen consecutive
breast lumpectomy margins in this study by touch preparation cytology.
Cytologic preparations were intraoperatively correlated with gross and
frozen section results and subsequently with permanent histologic sections
of representative margins. Three specimens were cytologically
unsatisfactory and 86 yielded benign findings, while material suggestive or
diagnostic of malignancy was obtained from 25 specimens. Gross, frozen
section, and permanent histologic margins were positive in 10, 17, and 22
cases, respectively. There were three false-positive touch preparation
cytologic results, while frozen section specimens were false-negative in
five cases. Sensitivity and specificity of touch preparation cytology were
100% and 96.6%, respectively, with a diagnostic accuracy of 97.3%. Touch
preparation cytologic examination rapidly and reliably evaluates lumpectomy
margins and overcomes sampling errors and artifacts related to frozen
section evaluation. This technique currently complements frozen section
evaluation of lumpectomy margins as part of a protocol aimed at reducing
local recurrence of breast cancer.
Intraoperative Touch Preparation Cytology for Margin Assessment in Breast-Conservation Surgery: Does It Work for Lobular Carcinoma?
Valdes et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2007;14:2940-2945.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Frozen Section Analysis for Intraoperative Margin Assessment During Breast-Conserving Surgery Results in Low Rates of Re-excision and Local Recurrence
Olson et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2007;14:2953-2960.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Intra-operative Touch Preparation Cytology; Does It Have a Role in Re-excision Lumpectomy?
Valdes et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2007;14:1045-1050.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Advances in Breast Conservation Therapy
Newman and Kuerer
JCO 2005;23:1685-1697.
FULL TEXT
Usefulness of Core Roll Preparations in Immediate Assessment of Neoplastic Lung Lesions: Comparison to Conventional CT Scan-Guided Lung Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology
Chandan et al.
Chest 2004;126:739-743.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Analysis of Nipple/Areolar Involvement With Mastectomy: Can the Areola Be Preserved?
Simmons et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2002;9:165-168.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
A Comparison of Ink-Directed and Traditional Whole-Cavity Re-Excision for Breast Lumpectomy Specimens With Positive Margins
Gibson et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2001;8:693-704.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Intraoperative Pathologic Evaluation of a Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy as a Determinant for Synchronous Axillary Lymph Node Dissection
Kane III et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2001;8:361-367.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT