You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 4, April 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 43RD ANNUAL CANCER SYMPOSIUM OF THE SOCIETY OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, WASHINGTON, DC, MAY 19 TO 22, 1990-PAR T II
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Correction
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (54)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Touch Preparation Cytology of Breast Lumpectomy Margins With Histologic Correlation

Charles E. Cox, MD; Ni Ni Ku, MD; Douglas S. Reintgen, MD; Harvey M. Greenberg, MD; Santo V. Nicosia, MD; Stephen Wangensteen, MD

Arch Surg. 1991;126(4):490-493.


Abstract

• Residual microscopic disease after lumpectomy for breast cancer may cause significant local recurrence. We evaluated one hundred fourteen consecutive breast lumpectomy margins in this study by touch preparation cytology. Cytologic preparations were intraoperatively correlated with gross and frozen section results and subsequently with permanent histologic sections of representative margins. Three specimens were cytologically unsatisfactory and 86 yielded benign findings, while material suggestive or diagnostic of malignancy was obtained from 25 specimens. Gross, frozen section, and permanent histologic margins were positive in 10, 17, and 22 cases, respectively. There were three false-positive touch preparation cytologic results, while frozen section specimens were false-negative in five cases. Sensitivity and specificity of touch preparation cytology were 100% and 96.6%, respectively, with a diagnostic accuracy of 97.3%. Touch preparation cytologic examination rapidly and reliably evaluates lumpectomy margins and overcomes sampling errors and artifacts related to frozen section evaluation. This technique currently complements frozen section evaluation of lumpectomy margins as part of a protocol aimed at reducing local recurrence of breast cancer.

(Arch Surg. 1991;126:490-493)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery (Drs Cox, Reintgen, and Wangensteen), Pathology (Drs Ku and Nicosia), and Radiology (Dr Greenberg), University of South Florida Health Sciences Center, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication December 31, 1990.

Read before the 43rd Annual Cancer Symposium of the Society of Surgical Oncology, Washington, DC, May 20, 1990.

Reprint requests to the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida, PO Box 280179, Tampa, FL 33682-0179 (Dr Cox).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Advances in Breast Conservation Therapy
Newman and Kuerer
JCO 2005;23:1685-1697.
FULL TEXT  

Usefulness of Core Roll Preparations in Immediate Assessment of Neoplastic Lung Lesions: Comparison to Conventional CT Scan-Guided Lung Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology
Chandan et al.
Chest 2004;126:739-743.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.