You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 5, May 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (19)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Level of Axillary Involvement by Lymph Node Metastases From Breast Cancer Is Not an Independent Predictor of Survival

Richard J. Barth, Jr, MD; David N. Danforth, Jr, MD; David J. Venzon, PhD; Karen L. Straus, MD; Teresa d'Angelo, RN; Maria J. Merino, MD; Lynn Gerber, MD

Arch Surg. 1991;126(5):574-577.


Abstract

• We examined the relationship of axillary level of lymph node metastases from clinical stage I and II breast cancer to overall survival and disease-free survival rates in 135 patients who underwent complete axillary lymph node dissection to determine if anatomic level of axillary involvement (I vs II vs III) is an independent prognostic factor. All patients underwent either modified radical mastectomy or lumpectomy with axillary dissection and whole breast radiotherapy for breast cancer. Median follow-up was 6.9 years. We found no difference in overall survival or disease-free survival between patients whose highest or only level of axillary involvement was level I compared with patients whose highest or only level was II. Although patients whose highest level of nodal involvement was III had significantly worse overall survival and disease-free survival rates than patients whose highest nodal involvement was I or II, when patients were stratified by the total number of positive nodes (one to three vs four or more), there was no difference in overall survival or disease-free survival rates between levels I, II, and III. These findings indicate that the level of axillary involvement for stage II breast cancer is not of independent prognostic significance.

(Arch Surg. 1991;126:574-577)



Author Affiliations

From the Surgery (Drs Barth and Danforth) and Radiation Oncology (Dr Straus and Ms d'Angelo) Branches, the Laboratory of Pathology (Dr Merino), and the Biostatistics and Data Management Section (Dr Venzon), National Cancer Institute, and the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (Dr Gerber), Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md. Read before the 43rd Annual Cancer Symposium of the Society of Surgical Oncology, Washington, DC, May 21, 1990.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication December 8, 1990.

Reprint requests to Bldg 10, Rm 2B38, Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Dr Danforth).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

DNA Flow Cytometry Does Not Predict 5- or 10-Year Recurrence Rates for T1-2 Node-Negative Breast Cancer
Reed et al.
Arch Surg 2000;135:1422-1426.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment Differences and Other Prognostic Factors Related to Breast Cancer Survival: Delivery Systems and Medical Outcomes
Lee-Feldstein et al.
JAMA 1994;271:1163-1168.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.