You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 5, May 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Selective splenocaval shunt. Report of 26 cases and review of the literature

H. M. Atta, J. M. Henderson, J. R. Galloway and W. J. Millikan
Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga.

Splenocaval shunting was performed in 26 patients for the treatment of variceal bleeding. The indications for this alternative selective shunt were congenital anomalies of the left renal vein, inadequate outflow from the left renal vein on preoperative venography, or an anatomic relationship of the splenic vein favoring direct splenocaval rather than splenorenal anastomosis. Technical considerations in which splenocaval shunts differ from distal splenorenal shunting relate to exposure of the vena cava. Operative mortality was 7.7% (2/26). Immediate shunt patency was documented in 23 of 24 patients studied, and all 14 shunts studied at 13 to 57 months were patent. Portal perfusion was maintained in 95% (20/21) of the patients when studied at 7 to 10 days after shunting and in 57% (8/14) at late follow-up. This experience with distal splenocaval shunting has reaffirmed its place as an alternative technique to selective distal splenorenal shunts, particularly when the left renal vein is abnormal.





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.