You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 5, May 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (36)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

A Statewide Experience

J. David Richardson, MD; Karen A. Main, PhD

Arch Surg. 1991;126(5):614-616.


Abstract

• The results of elective treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysmsare excellent in many institutions. To our knowledge, however, no study has compared the results in a large geographic area in which patients were treated by a variety of surgeons and hospitals. We studied the results of repairing abdominal aortic aneurysms for all Medicare recipients during a single year in Kentucky. One hundred thirty-six operations were performed by 52 surgeons in 31 hospitals. Overall operative mortality was 18%; elective and emergency operative mortality rates were 6% and 49%, respectively. Advancing age did not affect outcome, but mortality due to ruptured aneurysms was higher in smaller hospitals than in larger hospitals. The low mortality for elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in an elderly population by numerous surgeons in divergent hospitals is a strong indication for its liberal use compared with the high mortality and morbidity of emergency surgery.

(Arch Surg. 1991;126:614-616)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, University of Louisville (Ky) School of Medicine (Dr Richardson), and the Kentucky Legislative Research Commission, Frankfort (Dr Main). Dr Main provided the statistical analysis.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication October 6, 1990.

Read before the annual meeting of the Southern Association for Vascular Surgery, Acapulco, Mexico, January 25, 1990.

Reprint requests to the Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292 (Dr Richardson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

EVAR, TEVAR, FEVAR, Too Far?
Clagett
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 2008;20:115-119.
ABSTRACT  

Outcome After Surgery: An Evolving Concept
Kazmers
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 1995;8:109-128.
 

Invited Commentary
Richardson
Arch Surg 1994;129:290-290.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.