You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 7, July 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  PAPERS
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (72)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Acute Diverticulitis

A Complicated Problem in the Immunocompromised Patient

Edward S. Tyau, MD; Jay B. Prystowsky, MD; Raymond J. Joehl, MD; David L. Nahrwold, MD

Arch Surg. 1991;126(7):855-859.


Abstract



• We reviewed the records of 209 patients with acute diverticulitis treated from 1984 through 1989 to determine if immunocompromised patients have a worse prognosis than nonimmunocompromised patients. Forty immunocompromised patients and 169 nonimmunocompromised patients with acute diverticulitis were identified. Free perforation into the peritoneal cavity occurred in 43% (17/40) of immunocompromised patients and 14% (24/169) of nonimmunocompromised patients. Operations were performed in 58% (23/40) of immunocompromised patients and 33% (55/169) of nonimmunocompromised patients. Postoperative morbidity was 65% (15/23) in immunocompromised patients and 24% (13/55) in nonimmunocompromised patients; postoperative mortality was 39% (9/23) and 2% (1/55), respectively. We conclude that acute diverticulitis in the immunocompromised patient is a complicated problem; there is a greater risk of free perforation and need for surgery than in the nonimmunocompromised patient. Furthermore, the prognosis for immunocompromised patients who undergo surgery is worse than that for nonimmunocompromised patients.

(Arch Surg. 1991;126:855-859)



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Ill.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication March 9, 1991.

Read before the 98th Annual Meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Scottsdale, Ariz, November 13, 1990.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, 250 E Superior St, Wesley, Suite 201, Chicago, IL 60611 (Dr Prystowsky).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Epidemiology of perforated colonic diverticular disease
Morris et al.
Postgrad. Med. J. 2002;78:654-658.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Efficacy of Locally Delivered Polyclonal Immunoglobulin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Peritonitis in a Murine Model
Barekzi et al.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1999;43:1609-1615.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Abdominal Operations After Lung Transplantation: Indications and Outcome
Pollard et al.
Arch Surg 1997;132:714-718.
ABSTRACT  

Colon Perforation After Lung Transplantation
Beaver et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1996;62:839-843.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.