You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 127 No. 12, December 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE 45TH ANNUAL CANCER SYMPOSIUM OF THE SOCIETY OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, NEW YORK, NY, MARCH 15-18, 1992
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (21)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Ten-Year Follow-up of Breast Carcinoma In Situ in Connecticut

Barbara A. Ward, MD; Charles F. McKhann, MD; T. S. Ravikumar, MD

Arch Surg. 1992;127(12):1392-1395.


Abstract

• Statistics from the Connecticut Tumor Registry from 1979 to 1988 were examined, and individual medical records from 1979 to 1983 were also reviewed. Three hundred nineteen medical records were available for review, documenting 220 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ and 102 cases of lobular carcinoma in situ. In 1979, there were 33 new cases of ductal carcinoma in situ reported to the Connecticut Tumor Registry, representing 1.8% of all breast cancers. There has been a yearly increase in ductal carcinoma in situ, with 200 new cases, or 7.4% of all breast cancers, reported in 1988. Forty-eight (22%) of 217 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ had bilateral breast involvement with ductal carcinoma in situ or an invasive breast cancer. Ten (83%) of 12 mastectomy specimens from patients with ductal carcinoma in situ who presented with nipple discharge demonstrated residual tumor, suggesting a more diffuse involvement. Two of the three reported recurrences involved nipple discharge. Thirty-seven (16.8%) of the 220 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ and six (5.9%) of the 102 patients with lobular carcinoma in situ were diagnosed as having another unrelated cancer. Ongoing clinical trials will direct optimum therapy for patients increasingly diagnosed as having ductal carcinoma in situ.

(Arch Surg. 1992;127:1392-1395)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication August 8, 1992.

Presented at the 45th Annual Cancer Symposium of the Society of Surgical Oncology, New York, NY, March 16, 1992.

Reprint requests to the Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, PO Box 3333, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06510 (Dr Ward).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Certainties and the Uncertainties of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
Morrow
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:424-425.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.