You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 127 No. 2, February 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE 11TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SURGICAL INFECTION SOCIETY, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLA
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (18)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A National Survey of Surgeons' Attitudes About Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infections and Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

Gene Ann Shelley, PhD; Richard J. Howard, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 1992;127(2):206-212.


Abstract

• We conducted a national survey to learn about surgeons' attitudes toward patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection and with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. We received 1039 (72%) responses from 1451 potential respondents. Seventy-four percent (766 of 1028) of surgeons were in favor of routine human immunodeficiency virus testing of patients, yet only 6% did so routinely and another 6% did so selectively. Most (88%) surgeons believed that patients had a right to know if their surgeon was infected with the human immunodeficiency virus and would agree to be tested if so requested by a patient. Most (72%) surgeons also believed that surgeons with the human immunodeficiency virus should have their operating privileges restricted. Only 8% knew the risk of acquiring human immunodeficiency virus infection if they sustained a percutaneous injury with contaminated blood, and only 61% were familiar with the Centers for Disease Control guidelines on universal precautions. The respondents also believed that others were "making the rules" for them while they were "taking the risks."

(Arch Surg. 1992;127:206-212)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Anthropology (Dr Shelley) and Surgery (Dr Howard), University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication November 2, 1991.

Reprint requests to University of Florida, College of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Box J-100286, JHMHC, Gainesville, FL 32610-0286 (Dr Howard).

Presented at the 11th Annual Meeting of the Surgical Infection Society, Fort Lauderdale, Fla, April 10, 1991.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Dealing with prejudice
O'Rourke
J. Med. Ethics 2001;27:123-125.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Decreasing occupational risk related to blood-borne viruses in cardiovascular surgery in Paris, France
Kuo et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1999;68:2267-2272.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Human immunodeficiency virus and the cardiac surgeon: a survey of attitudes
Frater
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1999;67:1203-1204.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.