You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 127 No. 7, July 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE 99TH SCIENTIFIC SESSION OF THE WESTERN SURGICAL ASSOCIATION COLORADO SPRINGS, COLO, NOVEMBER 15-18, 1991
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Usefulness of Preoperative Laboratory Assessment of Patients Undergoing Elective Herniorrhaphy

John G. Adams, Jr, MD; John A. Weigelt, MD; Ernest Poulos, MD

Arch Surg. 1992;127(7):801-805.


Abstract



• Preoperative laboratory utilization was evaluated in a retrospective review of 169 adults undergoing elective inguinal herniorrhaphy at a county/university hospital and at a private/community hospital. Tests monitored included a complete blood cell count, urinalysis, serum electrolytes, chest roentgenography, and electrocardiography. Abnormal results and results that altered the patients' treatment were sought. Two groups of patients were evaluated. Group 1 (n=105) had no disease except for the inguinal hernia; group 2 (n=64) had evidence of another disease process. Preoperative evaluation of patients in group 1 was similar at the county/university hospital and at the private/community hospital except for increased electrolyte screening at the county/university hospital among patients younger than age 40 years. No differences between hospitals were present among patients in group 2. Abnormal results not predicted by medical history or physical examination were found in 1% of patients in group 1 and 1.4% of patients in group 2. Only four patients (2%) had their treatment altered by these findings. Preoperative laboratory evaluation of these patients revealed that an abnormal test result not predicted by history and physical examination is rare. Routine preoperative laboratory testing is of little value in this patient population.

(Arch Surg. 1992;127:801-805)



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Surgery, St Paul Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (Drs Adams and Poulos), and the Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Critical Care and Trauma Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (Dr Weigelt).


Footnotes



Accepted for publication March 7, 1992.

Presented at the 99th Scientific Session of the Western Surgical Association, Colorado Springs, Colo, November 19, 1991.

Reprint requests to the Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75235-9031 (Dr Weigelt).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

How Much Routine Preoperative Laboratory Testing Is Enough?
Velanovich
American Journal of Medical Quality 1993;8:145-151.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.