You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 127 No. 8, August 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Late results of suprarenal Greenfield vena cava filter placement

L. J. Greenfield, K. J. Cho, M. C. Proctor, M. Sobel, S. Shah and J. Wingo
Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Placement of the Greenfield filter above the renal veins was necessary in 71 (9%) of 821 total patients in the filter registries of two institutions. The status of 60 patients (85%) could be verified, with follow-up data ranging from 18 months to 16 years (average, 53 months). Of 24 deaths (34%), none was from recurrent embolism or renal failure; death was most commonly associated with a malignant neoplasm. The recurrent embolism rate was 4%, identical to the infrarenal experience. Duplex evaluation of the filters in 22 patients, representing the majority (61%) of living patients, showed that all the filters were patent. Sixteen patients (41%) had lower-extremity edema that predated filter insertion, and in no patient did the results of noninvasive venous studies worsen. Filter fracture (two patients) or distal migration (two patients) had no clinical sequelae, and there was no evidence of renal dysfunction. For thrombus extending to the level of the renal veins or within them and for pregnant patients or women of childbearing age, suprarenal placement of the Greenfield filter is safe and effective, with no filter obstruction seen in follow-up extending to 16 years.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Vena Caval Filters: A Review for Intensive Care Specialists
Streiff
J Intensive Care Med 2003;18:59-79.
ABSTRACT  

Placement of Vena Cava Filters: Factors Affecting Technical Success and Immediate Complications
Savin et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2002;179:597-602.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Massive Pulmonary Embolism During Pregnancy Successfully Treated With Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator: A Case Report and Review of Treatment Options
Ahearn et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1221-1227.
FULL TEXT  

Guidelines on diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism
Eur Heart J 2000;21:1301-1336.
 

Vena caval filters: a comprehensive review
Streiff
Blood 2000;95:3669-3677.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Review Article: Management of pulmonary embolus in pregnancy
de Swiet
Eur Heart J 1999;20:1378-1385.
 

Patient Outcomes Following Placement of a Second Inferior Vena Cava Filter: Case Reports
Haase et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1998;32:633-637.
ABSTRACT  

Experience with Greenfield Filters in Pregnant Women for Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism Case Reports
Noel et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1998;32:367-372.
ABSTRACT  

Venous Thromboembolism during Pregnancy
Toglia and Weg
NEJM 1996;335:108-114.
FULL TEXT  

Recent Developments in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention of Pulmonary Embolism
Hastings et al.
Arch Fam Med 1993;2:655-669.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.