You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 128 No. 1, January 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE 12TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SURGICAL INFECTION SOCIETY, LOS ANGELES, CALIF, APRIL 9, 1992
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Prospective Alterations in Therapy for Penetrating Abdominal Trauma

Ronald Lee Nichols, MD, MS; Jeffrey W. Smith, MS, MPH; George D. Robertson, MD; Anita C. Muzik, MT (ASCP); Patricia Pearce, RN, MPH; Vahit Ozmen, MD; Norman E. McSwain, Jr, MD; Lewis M. Flint, MD

Arch Surg. 1993;128(1):55-64.


Abstract

• In a double-blind, randomized study, 170 patients with traumatic perforation of the gastrointestinal tract were administered an advanced-generation cephalosporin. Patients were divided into infection risk groups (≤40%, low; 40% to 70%, mid; and >70%, high) at surgical closure using a logistic regression formula based on four proved risk factors—age, blood replacement, ostomy, and the number of organs injured. Patients in the low group received 2 days of antibiotic therapy; those in the mid to high group received 5 days of antibiotic therapy. Those patients in the low to mid group had primary wound closure; those in the high group had their wounds packed open and closed later. Most of the patients (144 [85%]) were in the low group. Their major and minor infection rates (10% and 12%, respectively) were not significantly different from 145 historic control subjects receiving 5 days of antibiotic therapy (9% major; 14% minor). Patients in the mid to high group showed a greater incidence of major infections (46%) but a similar incidence of minor infections (12%). The results indicate that risk factors can be used to identify low-risk patients who require only short-term antibiotic therapy and primary wound closure. The remaining patients are at greater risk for infection despite prolonged antibiotic therapy and delayed wound closure.

(Arch Surg. 1993;128:55-64)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery, Tulane University, School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (Drs Nichols, Ozmen, McSwain, and Flint and Mr Smith, and Mss Muzik and Pearce), and the Huey P. Long Medical Center, Pineville, La (Dr Robertson).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication August 15, 1992.

Presented at the 12th Annual Meeting of the Surgical Infection Society, Los Angeles, Calif, April 11, 1992.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, Tulane University, School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Ave, New Orleans, LA 70112 (Dr Nichols).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Trial of Ciprofloxacin and Metronidazole vs Gentamicin and Metronidazole for Penetrating Abdominal Trauma
Tyburski et al.
Arch Surg 1998;133:1289-1296.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.