You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 128 No. 1, January 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgical wounds. Guidelines for clinical care

C. P. Page, J. M. Bohnen, J. R. Fletcher, A. T. McManus, J. S. Solomkin and D. H. Wittmann
Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78284-7842.

Prophylactic administration of antibiotics can decrease postoperative morbidity, shorten hospitalization, and reduce the overall costs attributable to infections. Principles of prophylaxis include providing effective levels of antibiotics in the decisive interval, and, in most instances, limiting the course to intraoperative coverage only. Use in The National Research Council clean contaminated operations is appropriate and, in many instances, has been proven beneficial. Antibiotic prophylaxis is also indicated for clean operations, such as those involved with insertion of prosthetic devices, that are associated with low infection risk and high morbidity. Extension of antibiotic prophylaxis to other categories of clean wounds should be limited to patients with two or more risk factors established by criteria in the study of the efficacy of nosocomial infection control (SENIC) because the baseline infection rate in these patients is high enough to justify their use. Cefazolin (or cefoxitin when anaerobic coverage is necessary) remains the mainstay of prophylactic therapy. Selection of an alternate agent should be based on specific contraindications, local infection control surveillance data, and the results of clinical trials. Newer criteria for determining the risk of "site infection" (wound and intracavitary) are in evolution and may lead to modification of these recommendations over the next several years.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Prophylactic Antibiotics in Orthopaedic Surgery
Prokuski
J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008;16:283-293.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ensuring Appropriate Timing of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis
Rosenberg et al.
JBJS 2008;90:226-232.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

End-of-procedure cefazolin concentrations after administration for prevention of surgical-site infection
Koopman et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64:1927-1934.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical and economic outcomes of pharmacist-managed antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgical patients
Bond and Raehl
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64:1935-1942.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevention of Perioperative Infection
Fletcher et al.
JBJS 2007;89:1605-1618.
FULL TEXT  

Locally Administered Antibiotics for Prophylaxis Against Surgical Wound Infection. An in Vivo Study
Yarboro et al.
JBJS 2007;89:929-933.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ertapenem versus Cefotetan Prophylaxis in Elective Colorectal Surgery
Itani et al.
NEJM 2006;355:2640-2651.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A System and Process Redesign to Improve Perioperative Antibiotic Administration
Kanter et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2006;103:1517-1521.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Exploring obstacles to proper timing of prophylactic antibiotics for surgical site infections
Tan et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:32-38.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Practice Guideline Series: Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Cardiac Surgery, Part I: Duration
Edwards et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2006;81:397-404.
FULL TEXT  

Evidence-Based Practice in Laparoscopic Surgery: Perioperative Care
Goldfaden and Birkmeyer
SURG INNOV 2005;12:51-61.
ABSTRACT  

Use of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Major Surgery: Baseline Results From the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project
Bratzler et al.
Arch Surg 2005;140:174-182.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Practice variation in perioperative antibiotic use in Japan
Sekimoto et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2004;16:367-373.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Adherence to local hospital guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: a multicentre audit in Dutch hospitals
van Kasteren et al.
J Antimicrob Chemother 2003;51:1389-1396.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Pediatric Surgical Patients
Red Book 2003;2003:774-778.
FULL TEXT  

Surgery for colorectal cancer
Dorudi et al.
Br Med Bull 2002;64:101-118.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clostridium difficile Colitis: An Increasingly Aggressive Iatrogenic Disease?
Morris et al.
Arch Surg 2002;137:1096-1100.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Commonality of Risk Factors for Nosocomial Colonization and Infection with Antimicrobial-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus, Gram-Negative Bacilli, Clostridium difficile, and Candida
Safdar and Maki
ANN INTERN MED 2002;136:834-844.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Commentary: Applying Hospital Quality Indicators to Clinical Practice
Fisher and Fiorilli
American Journal of Medical Quality 2001;16:58-60.
ABSTRACT  

Antimicrobial prophylaxis
Smith and Finn
Arch. Dis. Child. 1999;80:388-392.
FULL TEXT  

Prophylactic Anti-Infective Activity of Poly-[1-6]-beta -D-Glucopyranosyl-[1-3]-beta -D-Glucopyranose Glucan in a Guinea Pig Model of Staphylococcal Wound Infection
Kernodle et al.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1998;42:545-549.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Perioperative Normothermia and Surgical-Wound Infection
Benzer et al.
NEJM 1996;335:747-750.
FULL TEXT  

Post-Operative Infection Following Hand Surgery: Guidelines for Antibiotic Use
PLATT and PAGE
J Hand Surg Eur Vol 1995;20:685-690.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.