You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 128 No. 10, October 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Articles
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (21)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Predictors of Outcome in Patients Who Have Sustained Trauma and Who Undergo Emergency Thoracotomy

Jeffrey Kavolius, MD; Mario Golocovsky, MD; Howard R. Champion, FRCS (Edin)

Arch Surg. 1993;128(10):1158-1162.


Abstract

Objective
To reassess the use of emergency thoracotomy in resuscitating victims of abdominal or thoracic trauma.

Design
Retrospective review of records and autopsy reports of patients who underwent an emergency thoracotomy between 1983 and 1989.

Setting
Washington Hospital Center's Level I trauma center.

Patients
Two hundred eighty-four hemodynamically unstable trauma patients (212 [75%] with penetrating injuries and 72 [25%] with blunt injuries).

Intervention
Emergency thoracotomy performed in the trauma operating room or in one of the trauma bays.

Main Outcome Measures and Key Findings
In which subset of trauma patients is emergency thoracotomy a useful therapeutic modality? Performance of an emergency thoracotomy for blunt trauma resulted in an overall survival rate of 6% compared with 27% for penetrating trauma. The survival rate for patients with penetrating cardiac trauma was 32% (44% for stab wounds and 21% for gunshot wounds). Tamponade is a major factor associated with survival in this subset of patients and may act as a pathophysiologic filter.

Conclusions
Emergency thoracotomy is a useful therapeutic modality for victims of penetrating trauma who have vital signs on admission to the hospital, and it should be considered in blunt trauma patients who present with any evidence of life. This modality is largely ineffective, however, in resuscitating victims of penetrating and blunt trauma who present to the hospital without vital signs.

(Arch Surg. 1993;128:1158-1162)



Author Affiliations

From the Womack Army Medical Center, Fort Bragg, NC, and the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md (Dr Kavolius); and the Department of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care (Dr Golocovsky) and the Trauma Service, Department of Surgical Critical Care and Emergency Services (Dr Champion), Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

CHAPTER 31 Diseases of the Aorta and Trauma to the Aorta and the Heart
Nienaber et al.
ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine 2009;2:med-9780199566990-chapter-med-9780199566990-chapter.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Suicidal nonfatal impalement injury of the thorax
Cartwright et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2001;72:1364-1366.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.