You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 128 No. 2, February 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Postoperative Intra-abdominal Sepsis Requiring Reoperation

Value of a Predictive Index

Jorge F. Pusajó, MD; Eduardo Bumaschny, MD; Guillermo R. Doglio, MD; Mario R. Cherjovsky, MD; Alberto I. Lipinszki, MD; Maria S. Hernández, MD; Mónica A. Egurrola, MD

Arch Surg. 1993;128(2):218-223.


Abstract

• In this study we analyze the results of the use of a predictive index to decide whether to perform abdominal reoperation in the event of septic complications. During a 5-year period, a population of 542 critically ill patients received major abdominal surgery. Patients were divided into two groups: (1) the control group, for which the decision to reoperate was made routinely, based on clinical consensus of the medical team; and (2) the Abdominal Reoperation Predictive Index group, for which the decision to reoperate was made with the help of a mathematical index involving eight mainly clinical variables. The use of Abdominal Reoperation Predictive Index enabled mortality among patients undergoing reoperation to be lowered, the time elapsing between the first operation and relaparotomy to be reduced, and the length of stay in the intensive care unit to be shortened. We conclude that the systematic application of an index, without disregarding clinical judgment, allows the quality of attention to be improved, cost to be lowered, and the level of conflicts generated by the difficult decision to perform reoperation to be curtailed.

(Arch Surg. 1993;128:218-223)



Author Affiliations

From the General Surgery Service and Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Israelita "Ezrah," Buenos Aires, Argentina (Drs Pusajó, Bumaschny, Doglio, Cherjovsky, Lipinszki, Hernández, and Egurrola), and the Department of Surgery, University of Buenos Aires (Drs Bumaschny and Cherjovsky).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 22, 1992.

Reprint requests to Av Rivadavia 4390, 14° "D," 1205 Buenos Aires, Argentina (Dr Bumaschny).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Comparison of On-Demand vs Planned Relaparotomy Strategy in Patients With Severe Peritonitis: A Randomized Trial
van Ruler et al.
JAMA 2007;298:865-872.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment of Postoperative Peritonitis of Small-Bowel Origin With Continuous Enteral Nutrition and Succus Entericus Reinfusion
Calicis et al.
Arch Surg 2002;137:296-300.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prognosis and Treatment of Peritonitis: Do We Need New Scoring Systems?
Koperna and Schulz
Arch Surg 1996;131:180-186.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.