You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 128 No. 3, March 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (23)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Recurrent Cholangitis With and Without Anastomotic Stricture After Biliary-Enteric Bypass

Jeffrey B. Matthews, MD; Hans U. Baer, MD; Walter P. Schweizer, MD; Philip Gertsch, MD; Thierey Carrel, MD; Leslie H. Blumgart, MD

Arch Surg. 1993;128(3):269-272.


Abstract

• We recently surgically treated 24 patients incapacitated by recurrent cholangitis after biliary-enteric anastomosis performed for benign disease. Contrary to commonly held dogma, as many as one third of the patients had no evidence of anastomotic stricture indicated by radiologic and operative findings. We identified several other primary and coexistent pathogenetic factors including intrahepatic stricture in 42% of the patients, intrahepatic calculi in 25%, improperly constructed enteric conduits in 13%, and conditions that predispose to bacterial overgrowth in the biliary tree in 17%. Seventy-one percent of the patients had multiple etiologic factors, and of those patients without demonstrable anastomotic stricture, intrahepatic stricture was particularly common. Seventy-one percent remained symptom-free in their first year after operation. The most difficult situation to manage, and the factor responsible for most recurrences after our reoperation, involved intrahepatic stricture. A combined surgical and interventional radiologic approach to complex cases may be useful in selected patients.

(Arch Surg. 1993;128:269-272)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery and Pancreaticobiliary Center, Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, Mass (Dr Matthews), and the Department of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland (Drs Baer, Schweizer, Gertsch, Carrel, and Blumgart).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication May 16, 1992.

Presented as part of a scientific symposium to honor William Silen, MD, at Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, Mass, May 16, 1991.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, MA 02215 (Dr Matthews).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Management of Benign Biliary Strictures: Biliary Enteric Anastomosis vs Endoscopic Stenting
Tocchi et al.
Arch Surg 2000;135:153-157.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Refined Approach to the Repair of Postcholecystectomy Bile Duct Strictures
Sutherland et al.
Arch Surg 1999;134:299-302.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.