You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 128 No. 4, April 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Manometry of individual segments of the distal esophageal sphincter. Its relation to functional incompetence

P. F. Crookes, B. K. Kaul, T. R. DeMeester, H. J. Stein and M. Oka
Department of Surgery, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles 90033-4612.

The major components of the lower esophageal sphincter, the pressure it exerts, its total length, and the length of sphincter affected by abdominal pressure are usually expressed as means of several recordings from different radial segments of the sphincter. In segmental manometry, the individual readings for these components in each segment, rather than the mean values, are analyzed. We used segmental manometry to study 50 normal volunteers and 200 patients with symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux. Of the latter, 100 had increased esophageal acid exposure and 100 did not. An increased number of defective segments was associated with a greater prevalence of increased esophageal acid exposure. Segmental analysis disclosed the same number (52) of defective sphincters (defined as sphincters with two or more defective segments) in the 100 patients with increased acid exposure as did standard analysis. However, the relationship between a defective lower esophageal sphincter and the number of reflux episodes was clearer when a defective sphincter was defined using standard analysis. Segmental analysis of the lower esophageal sphincter has no clear advantage over standard analysis.





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.