You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 128 No. 5, May 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Breast cancer and earlier detection efforts. Realized and unrealized impact on stage

M. F. Farwell, R. S. Foster Jr and M. C. Costanza
Department of Surgery, University of Vermont, Burlington.

OBJECTIVE--To test our hypotheses that increased public and professional education in breast cancer detection (screening mammography, clinical breast examination, and breast self-examination) would lead to detection at earlier stages of disease with each of the three methods. DESIGN AND SETTING--A survey study of all pathologically diagnosed breast cancers in a defined geographic area (all nonfederal general hospitals in the state of Vermont) before (1975-1984, n = 1652) and after (1989-1990, n = 683) screening mammography became more commonly used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Method of detection of breast cancer and stage at detection. RESULTS--The age-adjusted annual incidence rate of breast cancer among adult women was 99 per 100,000 during the years 1975 to 1984 compared with 169 per 100,000 during 1989-1990 (P < .001). Mammography as the method of detection increased in use from 2% to 36% (P < .001). In the later era, invasive breast cancers were detected at more favorable TNM stage (P < .001); mean maximum tumor diameter was smaller (2.2 cm vs 2.7 cm; P < .001); percentage of histologically positive nodes was lower (37% vs 47%; P < .001). When mammographically detected cancers were excluded from the analysis of invasive cancers, the mean maximum tumor diameter and percentage of negative nodes in the two eras were similar even though there was an apparent shift to detection at an earlier clinical stage. CONCLUSION--The earlier stages of detection and the sudden increase in incidence could almost entirely be credited to screening mammography. Mammographic screening had a much greater impact on stage at detection in women aged 50 years and older than in those younger than 50 years.





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.