You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 128 No. 7, July 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Papers Presented at the 100th Scientific Session of the Western Surgical Association, San Antonio, Tex, November 15-18, 1992
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Upper Extremity Bypass Grafting

A 15-Year Experience

Charles L. Mesh, MD; Walter J. McCarthy, MD; William H. Pearce, MD; William R. Flinn, MD; Paula K. Shireman, MD; James S. T. Yao, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 1993;128(7):795-802.


Abstract

Objective
To analyze the perioperative morbidity and mortality, long-term patient survival, and patency characteristics of arterial bypass related to upper extremity ischemia.

Design
This is a retrospective review of sequential patients undergoing upper extremity arterial bypass during a 15-year period at a single tertiary-care teaching hospital. Data are expressed in a 5-year life-table format and interpreted using log-rank analysis.

Patients
Seventy-four patients with upper extremity ischemia undergoing arterial bypass, which included 95 separate operations.

Main Outcome Measures
Operative morbidity and mortality, life-table survival, life-table bypass graft patency, and limb salvage are reported.

Results
There was no operative mortality, and there was a single major amputation. Survival rate was 86% at 5 years, and overall patency rate was 61.2% at 5 years, with autogenous conduits superior at all sites compared with prosthesis (70.9% vs 37.7%). Secondary operation was inferior to primary bypass (66% vs 48%) and associated with higher morbidity (22% vs 5%). All far distal forearm prosthetic bypass grafts failed within 1 year.

Conclusions
Primary upper extremity bypass with venous conduit is a safe, durable procedure, after which prolonged patient survival can be expected.

(Arch Surg. 1993;128:795-802)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery (Dr Mesh), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, and the Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery (Drs McCarthy, Pearce, Flinn, Shireman, and Yao), and the Feinberg Cardiovascular Research Institute (Drs McCarthy, Pearce, Flinn, Shireman, and Yao), Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Ill.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Prognostic Factors of Chronic Upper Limb Ischemia and Endoscopic Thoracic Sympathectomy
Onohara et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1998;32:139-149.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.