Repair of pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. An analysis of operative management

T. J. Nypaver, A. D. Shepard, D. J. Reddy, J. P. Elliott Jr, R. F. Smith and C. B. Ernst
Division of Vascular Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze different operative approaches for repair of pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm, to define factors associated with perioperative morbidity, particularly renal insufficiency, and to compare the results of pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with standard infrarenal repair. DESIGN: Case series review of all patients undergoing repair of nonruptured pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms over 7 consecutive years at a tertiary care teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Fifty-three consecutive patients with nonruptured atherosclerotic pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms undergoing operative repair. A comparison group of 65 patients randomly selected from a pool of 384 patients undergoing concurrent infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operative morbidity and mortality, postoperative renal insufficiency, estimated blood loss, perioperative blood and fluid requirements, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Postoperative renal insufficiency was more likely when concomitant renal revascularization was performed (P = .007) or when any major intraoperative complication occurred (P = .008). Retroperitoneal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair was associated with lower estimated blood loss (P = .05) and less fluid requirement within the first 24 hours following operation than transperitoneal repair (P = .03). No differences in outcome measures were identified with regard to site of proximal aortic clamping (supraceliac vs suprarenal). Pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms were larger and their repair was associated with greater estimated blood loss (P = .007), intraoperative blood replacement (P < .001), and a longer hospital stay (P = .02) than infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. CONCLUSIONS: Pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is a technically challenging operation associated with significant morbidity. A retroperitoneal approach facilitates repair. The site of proximal aortic cross-clamping should be dictated by technical factors and not by any perceived outcome advantages.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

ACC/AHA 2005 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease (Lower Extremity, Renal, Mesenteric, and Abdominal Aortic): Executive Summary A Collaborative Report From the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease): Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation
Hirsch et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1239-1312.
FULL TEXT  

Management of Juxtarenal Aortic Aneurysms and Occlusive Disease with Preferential Suprarenal Clamping Via a Midline Transperitoneal Incision: Technique and Results
Ryan et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 2004;38:417-422.
ABSTRACT  

Juxtarenal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
Rosen and Fantini
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 2000;34:25-31.
ABSTRACT