You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 128 No. 8, August 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Intermittent sequential pneumatic compression in prevention of venous stasis associated with pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

J. A. Millard, B. B. Hill, P. S. Cook, M. E. Fenoglio and L. H. Stahlgren
Department of Surgery, Saint Joseph Hospital, Denver, Colo.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether pneumoperitoneum and reverse Trendelenburg's position used during laparoscopy impede common femoral venous flow and whether calf-length intermittent sequential pneumatic compression (ISPC) overcomes this impedance. DESIGN: Using Doppler ultrasonography, peak systolic velocities in the common femoral vein were measured in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with peritoneal insufflation of carbon dioxide. Measurements were obtained during three intervals: preoperatively with the patients in the supine position; after induction of general anesthesia with the patients in the supine position; and after insufflation to 13 to 15 mm Hg with the patients in the 30 degrees reverse Trendelenburg position (both with and without ISPC). Mean arterial pressure and heart rate were obtained concurrently. Measurements of preoperative and postoperative calf and thigh circumferences were obtained. SETTING: A tertiary care center. PATIENT PARTICIPANTS: A consecutive sample of 20 patients 30 to 70 years of age (15 women and five men) who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and met the inclusion criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Peak systolic velocity, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and calf and thigh circumferences. RESULTS: The combination of pneumoperitoneum to 13 to 15 mm Hg and a 30 degrees reverse Trendelenburg position significantly decreased peak systolic velocity in the common femoral vein from a preoperative mean of 0.24 +/- 0.025 m/s to 0.14 +/- 0.011 m/s, or a 42% decrease. Intermittent sequential pneumatic compression reversed that effect, returning peak systolic velocity to 0.27 +/- 0.021 m/s. The mean difference between preoperative peak systolic velocity and peak systolic velocity with a combination of pneumoperitoneum, reverse Trendelenburg's position, and ISPC was 0.03 +/- 0.03 m/s but was not significant. Anesthesia alone caused a mean increase in preoperative peak systolic velocity from 0.24 +/- 0.025 m/s to 0.3 +/- 0.032 m/s. Mean arterial pressure levels, heart rate, and calf and thigh circumferences did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a significant reduction in common femoral venous flow during laparoscopic cholecystectomy coincident with pneumoperitoneum and reverse Trendelenburg's position. Intermittent sequential pneumatic compression reversed that effect, returning peak systolic velocity to normal.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Intermittent pneumatic compression prevents venous stasis in the lower extremities in the lithotomy position : [Une compression pneumatique intermittente previent l'insuffisance veineuse aux membres inferieurs en position gynecoloqique]
Kohro et al.
Canadian J. Anesthesia 2002;49:144-147.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Effects of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression on Systemic and Local Fibrinolysis
Labropoulos et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1999;33:211-218.
ABSTRACT  

Transesophageal Echocardiographic Detection of Gas Embolism and Cardiac Valvular Dysfunction During Laparoscopic Nephrectomy
Fahy et al.
Anesth. Analg. 1999;88:500-500.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Incidence of Deep Vein Thrombosis After Laparoscopic vs Minilaparotomy Cholecystectomy
Lord et al.
Arch Surg 1998;133:967-973.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.