You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 128 No. 9, September 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Hepatic resection for hepatolithiasis

S. T. Fan, E. C. Lai and J. Wong
Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the results of hepatic resection for hepatolithiasis. DESIGN: A retrospective study of case records of patients with hepatolithiasis undergoing hepatic resection. These patients had been followed up for 3 to 38 months. They were referred to Queen Mary Hospital, a tertiary referral center in Hong Kong. PATIENTS: Of 172 patients with hepatolithiasis seen between January 1984 and December 1981, 63 patients underwent hepatic resection because the affected liver segments were destroyed by repeated infection (n = 51), multiple cholangitic liver abscesses were found in the affected liver segments (n = 9), or concomitant intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was diagnosed (n = 3). INTERVENTION: Left lateral segmentectomy was performed in 42 patients, left hepatic lobectomy in 15 patients, right hepatic lobectomy in one patient, and segmentectomy in five patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative morbidity and mortality analysis. RESULTS: Contrary to hepatic resection in a normal liver, dissection to isolate inflow and outflow vasculature was difficult in 52% of cases owing to severe inflammatory fibrosis at the liver hilum, at the umbilical fissure, or at the junction of hepatic vein with inferior vena cava. The operative morbidity rate was 32% and the mortality rate was 2%. The majority of complications were wound infection, subphrenic abscesses, or biliary fistulas, which could be due to the presence of infected bile (85%) and liver abscesses (25%) in this disease. Statistical analysis of the preoperative hematological and biochemical variables and the amount of intraoperative blood loss could not identify any factor with significance in correlating with the development of postoperative complications. Stones recurred in 16% after a median follow-up of 47 months. CONCLUSION: Hepatic resection is a satisfactory treatment for hepatolithiasis. The postoperative septic complication rate is high and is an intrinsic problem related to liver resection in a septic condition.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Liver Resection for Intrahepatic Stones
Cheung and Kwok
Arch Surg 2005;140:993-997.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Indication and Procedure for Treatment of Hepatolithiasis
Uchiyama et al.
Arch Surg 2002;137:149-153.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Are Expandable Metallic Stents Better Than Conventional Methods for Treating Difficult Intrahepatic Biliary Strictures With Recurrent Hepatolithiasis?
Jeng et al.
Arch Surg 1999;134:267-273.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.