You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 128 No. 9, September 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Papers
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Value of Sham-Feeding Tests in Patients With Postgastrectomy Syndromes

Barton G. G. Bradshaw, MD; Richard C. Thirlby, MD

Arch Surg. 1993;128(9):982-987.


Abstract

Objective
The value of gastric secretory testing in surgical practice has been questioned. Sham feeding (SF) is a test of gastric secretion that determines the status of gastric vagal innervation or incomplete vagotomy. Our purpose was to show that the results of SF tests affect operative strategy and/or clinical management.

Design
The medical records of 30 consecutive patients studied with SF in our laboratory were reviewed to determine if patient management was affected by the results of SF.

Patients
All 30 patients had prior vagotomies. Sham feeding was performed in patients (1) before planned reoperation for postgastrectomy syndromes (n=17), (2) with peptic ulcerations/pain of unclear etiology (n=8), or (3) postoperatively in those who were at high risk for recurrent ulcer (n=5).

Results
Sham feeding indicated complete vagotomy in 16 patients and incomplete vagotomy in 14 patients. In 17 patients studied before planned reoperation, operative strategy was affected by results of SF in 15 cases; five patients had revagotomies performed at reoperation, 11 did not, and one patient had her operation canceled. In patients with atypical postoperative ulcers/pain, management was changed in only two of eight patients. In the high-risk patients studied postoperatively, management was affected in four of five patients.

Conclusions
(1) We believe that our results justify the performance of SF before any reoperation on the stomach, since an operative plan was nearly always affected. (2) In patients with atypical peptic complaints after gastric surgery, SF usually (80%) confirmed acid hypersecretion, thereby affecting management less often. (3) Although unproved, we believe SF results can guide the use of "prophylactic" H2-blockers in treating selected high-risk postgastrectomy patients.

(Arch Surg. 1993;128:982-987)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Wash.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.