You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 129 No. 10, October 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Papers
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (43)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Comparison of Transjugular and Surgical Portosystemic Shunts on the Outcome of Liver Transplantation

Fabrice Menegaux, MD; Emmet B. Keeffe, MD; Edward Baker, MD; Hiroto Egawa, MD; Waldo Concepcion, MD; Thomas R. Russell, MD; Carlos O. Esquivel, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 1994;129(10):1018-1024.


Abstract

Objective
To analyze the effect of previous transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) vs surgical portosystemic shunt (SPS) on the outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

Design
A case series of 38 patients who underwent OLT: 25 with a previous TIPS and 13 with a previous SPS.

Setting
A liver transplant center and interventional radiology service in a private, tertiary referral medical center.

Patients
Eighteen men and seven women who had a TIPS before OLT were compared with nine men and four women who had an SPS before OLT.

Main Outcome Measures
Operative transfusion requirements, operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative liver chemistry studies, and graft and patient survival.

Results
Compared with patients who had an SPS, patients who had a TIPS had significantly less median transfusion requirements for packed red blood cells (5 vs 12 U), fresh-frozen plasma (0 vs 8 U), and thrombocytes (0 vs 1U). The median operative time (9 vs 13 hours), length of intensive care unit stay (3 vs 5 days), and length of hospital stay (12 vs 24 days) were also significantly less in patients who had a TIPS. The 2-year actuarial patient survival rate was 92% in both groups.

Conclusions
In patients undergoing OLT, TIPS is associated with reduced operative transfusion requirements, operative time, and length of intensive care unit and hospital stays compared with SPS. In the potential liver transplant candidate with refractory complications of portal hypertension, TIPS is preferred to SPS.

(Arch Surg. 1994;129:1018-1024)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Transplantation (Drs Menegaux, Keeffe, Egawa, Concepcion, and Esquivel), Radiology (Dr Baker), and Surgery (Dr Russell), California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Splenorenal Shunt: An Ideal Procedure in the Pacific
Wong et al.
Arch Surg 2002;137:1125-1129.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Interventional radiology in liver transplantation
Tibballs
Imaging 2002;14:329-339.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.