You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 129 No. 10, October 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Articles
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (23)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Prognostic Significance of Surgical Margin in Liver Resection of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Seizo Masutani, MD; Yo Sasaki, MD; Shingi Imaoka, MD; Shinichi Iwamoto, MD; Ichiro Ohashi, MD; Masao Kameyama, MD; Toshiyuki Kabuto, MD; Osamu Ishikawa, MD; Hiroshi Furukawa, MD; Hiroki Koyama, MD; Takeshi Iwanaga, MD

Arch Surg. 1994;129(10):1025-1030.


Abstract

Objective
To evaluate the prognostic significance of surgical margin in liver resection of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Design
Retrospective study.

Setting
The Center for Adult Diseases, Osaka, Japan, between 1980 and 1989.

Patients
One hundred eighty-five patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent liver resection with complete extirpation.

Main Outcome Measure
Cumulative survival rate.

Results
The patients were divided into a wide surgical margin group, in which the lesion was excised with a margin of 1.0 cm or more, and a narrow surgical margin group, in which the margin was less than 1.0 cm. No significant differences could be detected in survival rates for 3 years or longer. Mean±SE tumor sizes were 3.4±0.4 cm and 4.4±0.3 cm, respectively, in the wide and narrow surgical margin groups. The patients were divided into three groups according to tumor size: group 1, 2.0 cm or less in diameter; group 2, greater than 2.0 cm but 5.0 cm or less in diameter; and group 3, greater than 5.0 cm in diameter. In groups 2 and 3, no significant differences in survival rates were found between the wide and narrow surgical margin groups. In group 1, the survival rate was significantly higher in the wide surgical margin group than in the narrow surgical margin group (P<.05).

Conclusions
Small hepatocellular carcinomas of 2.0 cm or less in diameter should be resected with an adequate surgical margin. However, surgical margin was not a significant factor in the resection of hepatocellular carcinomas larger than 2.0 cm.

(Arch Surg. 1994;129:1025-1030)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Center for Adult Diseases, Osaka, Japan.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Role of Expression of Focal Adhesion Kinase in Progression of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Itoh et al.
Clin. Cancer Res. 2004;10:2812-2817.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.