You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 129 No. 12, December 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Papers
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (33)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Characterization and Impact of Wound Infection After Pancreas Transplantation

Jeffrey E. Everett, MD; David C. Wahoff, MD; Catherine Statz, RN; Kristen J. Gillingham, PhD; Angelika Gruessner, PhD; Rainer W. G. Gruessner, MD, PhD; Paul F. Gores, MD; David E. R. Sutherland, MD, PhD; David L. Dunn, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 1994;129(12):1310-1317.


Abstract

Objective
To characterize the incidence, microbial pathogenesis, risk factors, and impact of wound infection after pancreas transplantation.

Design
Retrospective analysis.

Setting
A large university hospital.

Patients
From January 1, 1990, to September 30, 1993, 197 patients underwent 207 consecutive pancreas transplantation procedures.

Main Outcome Measures
Wound infection and patient and allograft survival rates at 1 year.

Results
Sixty-nine patients (33%) suffered wound infections: 21 (10%) were superficial; 31 (15%), deep; and 17 (8%), combined. Most (74%) wound infections were monomicrobial. Staphylococcus epidermidis and Candida species were the most common pathogens. Prolonged operating time, older donors, and enteric drainage were associated with higher wound infection rates. Deep and combined wound infections led to allograft loss despite subsequent salvage procedures. Combined wound infection was associated with significantly higher mortality.

Conclusions
A deep wound infection should be an indication for allograft removal. Antifungal prophylaxis, stringent donor criteria, and delayed primary wound closure should lower the incidence of wound infection.

(Arch Surg. 1994;129:1310-1317)



Author Affiliations

From the Divisions of Surgical Infectious Disease (Drs Everett, Wahoff, and Dunn, and Ms Statz) and Transplantation (Drs Gillingham, A. Gruessner, R. Gruessner, Gores, Sutherland, and Dunn), Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Six Years of Surgical Wound Infection Surveillance at a Tertiary Care Center: Review of the Microbiologic and Epidemiological Aspects of 20,007 Wounds
Weiss III et al.
Arch Surg 1999;134:1041-1048.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pancreas Graft Loss Caused by Intra-abdominal Infection: A Risk Factor for a Subsequent Pancreas Retransplantation
Benedetti et al.
Arch Surg 1996;131:1054-1060.
ABSTRACT  

Long-term Peritoneal Dialysis Before Transplantation and Intra-abdominal Infection After Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantations
Papalois et al.
Arch Surg 1996;131:761-766.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.