You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 129 No. 4, April 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Papers
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Medicolegal Analysis of the Delayed Diagnosis of Cancer in 338 Cases in the United States

Kenneth A. Kern, MD

Arch Surg. 1994;129(4):397-404.


Abstract

Objective
To define the frequency, clinical characteristics, and legal outcomes of the delayed diagnosis of cancer leading to negligence litigation.

Design
Retrospective review of 338 jury verdict reports from 42 states in the United States.

Setting
State and federal civil court decisions, as reported to litigation survey services, in a 5-year interval from 1985 to 1990.

Results
Of 338 cancers divided into 13 major organ sites, breast (38%, n=127), gastrointestinal (15%, n=51), lung (15%, n=50), and head and neck cancers (10%, n=33) accounted for 80% (270/338) of lawsuits. The average diagnostic delay for 212 cases was 17 months. The median age of patients with delays was 15 years younger than the age of patients presenting with cancer in the general population. For cancers in nine major organ sites, the ratio of mortality for patients filing lawsuits to that for patients with cancer in the general population averaged 3.4:1. The total known indemnity payout was $140.2 million, with an average payout per case of $64 600. At 1 to 3 months of diagnostic delay, jury verdicts largely favored the defense (seven of 11 [65%] defense verdicts); after 6 months of delay, jury verdicts were almost evenly divided between defense verdicts, plaintiff verdicts, and out-of-court settlements.

Conclusions
The delayed diagnosis of cancer leading to negligence litigation is associated with significant indemnity payments, often involves middle-aged patients far younger than the expected age in the general cancer population, and is defensible only in the minority after 6 months of diagnostic delay.

(Arch Surg. 1994;129:397-404)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Conn.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Errors in Cancer Diagnosis: Current Understanding and Future Directions
Singh et al.
JCO 2007;25:5009-5018.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medical Malpractice and Facial Nerve Paralysis
Lydiatt
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:50-53.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

My Child Was Diagnosed with Cancer: Am I Satisfied?
Emami
AAP Grand Rounds 2001;6:20-21.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.