You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 129 No. 6, June 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Papers
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Physical Examination and Arteriography in Patients With Penetrating Zone II Neck Wounds

Peter Beitsch, MD; John A. Weigelt, MD; Emmett Flynn, MS; Shiela Easley, RN

Arch Surg. 1994;129(6):577-581.


Abstract

Objective
To review the management of patients with penetrating zone II neck wounds to discern the value of physical examination and proximity arteriography for predicting arterial injury.

Design
A retrospective chart review of 178 patients treated for penetrating wounds to the neck.

Setting
A level I trauma facility in Dallas, Tex.

Patients
All patients seen from 1987 to 1991 with platysma penetration in zone II of the neck.

Intervention
Physical examination, arteriography, and surgical exploration were used to identify patients with arterial injuries in the neck after penetrating trauma.

Main Outcome Measures
To identify the presence or absence of an arterial injury.

Results
Negative findings on physical examination ruled out an arterial injury in 99% of all patients. Patients with any sign of arterial injury had a 26% incidence of arterial injury confirmed at operation. Of 71 arteriograms in patients without signs or symptoms of arterial injury, only one had an arterial injury requiring operative intervention.

Conclusions
Findings on physical examination are good predictors of arterial injury in patients with penetrating neck wounds and can exclude injury in over 99% of patients. Arteriography is a sensitive test but has a very low yield (1.4%). These findings question whether the current practice of mandatory neck exploration or proximity arteriography is necessary for patients without signs or symptoms of injury who have penetrating wounds of the neck.

(Arch Surg. 1994;129:577-581)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (Dr Beitsch, Mr Flynn, and Ms Easley), and the Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota and St Paul—Ramsey Medical Center, St Paul (Dr Weigelt).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Endovascular Management of Vascular Trauma
Starnes and Arthurs
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 2006;18:114-129.
ABSTRACT  

Penetrating neck injury: a review
MacFarlane and Benn
Trauma 2002;4:79-90.
ABSTRACT  

Diagnosis of Arterial Injuries Caused by Penetrating Trauma to the Neck: Comparison of Helical CT Angiography and Conventional Angiography
Múnera et al.
Radiology 2000;216:356-362.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Penetrating Injuries of the Neck in Patients in Stable Condition: Physical Examination, Angiography, or Color Flow Doppler Imaging
Demetriades et al.
Arch Surg 1995;130:971-975.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.