You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 129 No. 8, August 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Articles
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Outcomes Following Injury in a Predominantly Rural-Population—Based Trauma Center

Scott Norwood, MD; Mary Beth Myers, RN, MS

Arch Surg. 1994;129(8):800-805.


Abstract

Objective
To determine the incidence, severity, and outcomes of injury in patients treated in a rural-based level I trauma center and to compare the outcomes with a nationally indexed patient population—the Major Trauma Outcome Study.

Design
Retrospective evaluation of trauma registry data.

Setting
State of Illinois designated level I trauma center located in Urbana.

Patients
A total of 2246 trauma patients admitted from August 1989 through August 1992, with a mortality cohort of 158 patients. There were 1735 patients (77%) with Injury Severity Scores less than or equal to 19 and 511 patients (23%) with more severe injuries (Injury Severity Scores ≥20).

Main Outcome Measures
Mortality rates using the TRISS method, the Major Trauma Outcome Study, and final patient dispositions.

Results
The overall mortality rate, excluding those patients who were pronounced dead on arrival, was 125/2213 (5.6%). Eighty-six (69%) of these 125 patients had neurological Abbreviated Injury Scores of 3 or greater, with neurotrauma being a major contributor to their deaths. The m-statistic was 0.99 and the z-statistic was –3.30 for the entire group. The observed probability of survival met or exceeded the expected probability of survival when compared with the Major Trauma Outcome Study in all categories.

Conclusion
Acceptable mortality rates compared with the Major Trauma Outcome Study can be achieved in a rural-community—based level I trauma center despite relatively small numbers of critically injured patients. Such outcomes may assist in justifying resource allocation for trauma centers in rural areas.

(Arch Surg. 1994;129:800-805)



Author Affiliations

From the Trauma Services, East Texas Medical Center, Tyler (Dr Norwood) and the Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, Ill (Ms Myers).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Design of the Northern Nevada Orthopaedic Trauma Panel: A Model, Level-II Community-Hospital System
Bray
JBJS 2001;83:283-283.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.