You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 10, October 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Direct observations of surgical wound infections at a comprehensive cancer center

G. R. Barber, J. Miransky, A. E. Brown, D. G. Coit, F. M. Lewis, H. T. Thaler, T. E. Kiehn and D. Armstrong
Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the rate of surgical site infection and risk factors for surgical site infection in patients with cancer and to evaluate antibiotic use patterns on surgical oncology services. DESIGN: Criterion standard. SETTING: Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, a comprehensive cancer center at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Over a 15-month period, 1226 patients undergoing 1283 surgical procedures performed by the Breast, Colorectal, and Gastric-Mixed Tumor surgical services. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Direct observation of surgical sites was performed by a single, surgeon-trained member of the hospital's Infection Control Section, adhering to an established protocol for grading of the surgical site. RESULTS: Operative procedures accounted for the following traditional wound class distributions: class I (clean), 630 cases; class II (clean-contaminated), 577 cases; class III (contaminated), 29 cases; and class IV (dirty-infected), 47 cases. Surgical site infection rates were 3.8% in class I; 8.8% in class II; 20.7% in class III; and 46.9% in class IV procedures. The mean (+/- SD) age was 57.7 +/- 14.3 years and the Anesthesiology Society of America physical assessment score, 2.3 +/- 0.7. The mean (+/- SD) operation time was 145 +/- 104.9 minutes. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated several risk factors for surgical site infection: obesity (P < .0001); a contaminated or dirty-infected surgical procedure category (P < .0001); operation time greater than 4 hours (P = .0004); Anesthesiology Society of America physical assessment score of 3 or greater (P < .01); and preoperative length of stay of 3 or more days (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for surgical site infection in patients with cancer are similar to those found in the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. However, as an individual risk factor among our patient population, obesity contributed as strongly as the surgical procedure category to a patient's likelihood of acquiring a surgical site infection. In addition to Anesthesiology Society of America status, length of the surgical procedure, and surgical procedure category, obesity should warrant consideration as an individual risk factor for surgical site infection.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Microbial Spectrum and Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile of Gram-Positive Aerobic Bacteria Isolated From Cancer Patients
Ashour and El-Sharif
JCO 2007;25:5763-5769.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk factors for leg harvest surgical site infections after coronary artery bypass graft surgery
Olsen et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2003;126:992-999.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prospective Identification of Risk Factors for Wound Infection After Lower Extremity Oncologic Surgery
Morris et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2003;10:778-782.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Weight Loss in Breast Cancer Patient Management
Chlebowski et al.
JCO 2002;20:1128-1143.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.