You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 10, October 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Five-year follow-up after radical surgery for colorectal cancer. Results of a prospective randomized trial

J. T. Makela, S. O. Laitinen and M. I. Kairaluoma
Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Finland.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an intensified follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer can lead to improved reresectability and a better long-term survival. DESIGN: A prospective randomized trial of 106 patients. SETTING: Oulu University Hospital, a referral center in northern Finland. PATIENTS: A total of 106 consecutive patients who underwent radical resection for colorectal cancer, 54 of whom were randomized into a conventional follow-up group and 52 into an intensified follow-up group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: After a 5-year follow-up, the time of detection of recurrence, the recurrence rates, the first method showing recurrence, the mode of recurrence, reresectability, and survival were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The recurrences were identified earlier in the intensified follow-up group than in the conventional follow-up group (mean +/- SD, 10 +/- 5 months vs 15 +/- 10 months). The overall recurrence rate was 41%, with 39% in the conventional group and 42% in the intensified group. Carcinoembryonic antigen determination was the most common method showing recurrence in both groups. Endoscopy and ultrasound were beneficial in the intensified follow-up group, but computed tomography failed to improve the diagnostics. The mode of recurrence did not differ between the groups. Radical resections were performed on 19% (8/43) of the patients, 14% (3/21) in the conventional group and 22% (5/22) in the intensified group. The cumulative 5-year survival was 54% in the conventional group and 59% in the intensified group. CONCLUSION: Earlier detection of recurrent colorectal cancer by intensified follow-up does not lead to either significantly increased reresectability or improved 5-year survival.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Guidelines for resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases
Garden et al.
Gut 2006;55:iii1-iii8.
FULL TEXT  

Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance after Cancer Resection: A Consensus Update by the American Cancer Society and US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.
Rex et al.
CA Cancer J Clin 2006;56:160-167.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Postoperative Surveillance in Patients With Colorectal Cancer Who Have Undergone Curative Resection: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial
Rodriguez-Moranta et al.
JCO 2006;24:386-393.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Colorectal Cancer Surveillance: 2005 Update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology Practice Guideline
Desch et al.
JCO 2005;23:8512-8519.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surveillance Strategies after Curative Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
Pfister et al.
NEJM 2004;350:2375-2382.
FULL TEXT  

The Value of Routine Serum Carcino-Embryonic Antigen Measurement and Computed Tomography in the Surveillance of Patients After Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer
Chau et al.
JCO 2004;22:1420-1429.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost effectiveness analysis of intensive versus conventional follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer
Renehan et al.
BMJ 2004;328:81.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tumor Microsatellite-Instability Status as a Predictor of Benefit from Fluorouracil-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Colon Cancer
Ribic et al.
NEJM 2003;349:247-257.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patients' views on follow up of colorectal cancer: implications for risk communication and decision making
Papagrigoriadis and Heyman
Postgrad. Med. J. 2003;79:403-407.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ongoing Care of Patients After Primary Treatment for Their Cancer
Kattlove and Winn
CA Cancer J Clin 2003;53:172-196.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surgery for colorectal cancer
Dorudi et al.
Br Med Bull 2002;64:101-118.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact on survival of intensive follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
Renehan et al.
BMJ 2002;324:813-813.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Routine Chest Roentgenography Is Unnecessary in the Work-Up of Stage I and II Breast Cancer
Chen et al.
JCO 2000;18:3503-3506.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recommended Colorectal Cancer Surveillance Guidelines by the American Society of Clinical Oncology
Desch et al.
JCO 1999;17:1312-1312.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

MONITORING AFTER COLORECTAL CANCER SURGERY
JWatch General 1995;1995:4-4.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.