This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Correction  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (127)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Factors That Influence the Results of Treatment

Lygia Stewart, MD; Lawrence W. Way, MD

Arch Surg. 1995;130(10):1123-1128.

Abstract
Objective
To analyze the treatment of bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy to discern the factors affecting outcome.

Design
An analysis of the treatment of 88 patients with laparoscopic bile duct injuries.

Setting
A university hospital.

Patients
Eighty-eight patients with major bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Main Outcome Measures
Success of treatment, morbidity rate, mortality rate, and length of illness.

Results
Operations to repair bile duct injuries were unsuccessful in 27 (96%) of 28 procedures when cholangiograms were not obtained preoperatively, and they were unsuccessful in 69% when cholangiographic data were incomplete. In some cases, lack of complete cholangiographic information led to an inappropriate and harmful operation. When cholangiographic data were complete, the first repair was successful in 16 (84%) of 19 patients. A primary end-to-end repair over a T tube (13 patients) was unsuccessful in every case in which the duct had been divided. Direct closure of a partial defect in the duct was successful in four of seven patients. Fifty-four (63%) of 84 Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomies were successful. Factors responsible for the unsuccessful outcomes were the following: incomplete excision of the scarred duct, use of nonabsorbable suture material, use of two-layer anastomosis, and failure to eradicate subhepatic infection before the attempted repair. Dilatation and stenting was uniformly unsuccessful as primary treatment (three patients) and was successful in only seven of 26 patients following a previous operative repair. Patients first treated by the primary surgeon had an average length of illness of 222 days (P<.01). Only 17% of primary repair attempts and no secondary repair attempts performed by the laparoscopic surgeon were successful. Patients whose first repair was performed by tertiary care biliary surgeons had a length of illness of 78 days (P<.01),and 45 (94%) of 48 repairs by tertiary care biliary surgeons were successful.

Conclusions
Surgeons who specialize in the repair of bile duct injuries achieve much better results than those with less experience. The worse results of other surgeons could be attributed in many instances to specific correctable errors. Nonsurgical treatment was usually unsuccessful and substantially increased the duration of disability.

(Arch Surg. 1995;130:1123-1129)

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Surgery, the University of California—San Francisco.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Bile Duct Injury During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Results of an Italian National Survey on 56 591 Cholecystectomies
Nuzzo et al.
Arch Surg 2005;140:986-992.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bile Duct Injury During Cholecystectomy and Survival in Medicare Beneficiaries
Flum et al.
JAMA 2003;290:2168-2173.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-term Biliary Function After Reconstruction of Major Bile Duct Injuries With Hepaticoduodenostomy or Hepaticojejunostomy
Moraca et al.
Arch Surg 2002;137:889-894.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Devastating and Fatal Complications Associated With Combined Vascular and Bile Duct Injuries During Cholecystectomy
Buell et al.
Arch Surg 2002;137:703-710.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

To Stent or Not to Stent Bilioenteric Anastomosis After Iatrogenic Injury: A Dilemma Not Answered?
Mercado et al.
Arch Surg 2002;137:60-63.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ductal Stones: Pathology, Clinical Manifestations, Laparoscopic Extraction Techniques, and Complications
Cuschieri
SURG INNOV 2000;7:246-261.
ABSTRACT  

The Institute of Medicine Report on Medical Errors
Richardson et al.
NEJM 2000;343:663-665.
FULL TEXT  

Portoenterostomy: An Old Treatment for a New Disease
Pickleman et al.
Arch Surg 2000;135:811-817.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Postcholecystectomy Abdominal Bile Collections
Lee et al.
Arch Surg 2000;135:538-544.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Biliary Duct Injury: Partial Segment IV Resection for Intrahepatic Reconstruction of Biliary Lesions
Mercado et al.
Arch Surg 1999;134:1008-1010.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Operative Repair of Bile Duct Injuries Involving the Hepatic Duct Confluence
Jarnagin and Blumgart
Arch Surg 1999;134:769-775.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT