You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 11, November 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Papers
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Tuberculin Screening of Trauma Admissions at a University Hospital

A Preventive Strategy

Rashmi Taneja, MD; Susan Merritt, PA-C; Susan Vanek, PA-C; Marian Passannante, PhD; David H. Livingston, MD

Arch Surg. 1995;130(11):1223-1227.


Abstract

Objective
To determine the prevalence of tuberculosis (TB) infection in our trauma service population, namely, those patients who had positive Mantoux (purified protein derivative [PPD] [tuberculin]) tests.

Design
Prospective study.

Setting
Trauma service at a university hospital in Newark, NJ.

Patients and Methods
During a 9-month period, 110 admitted trauma patients underwent screening for TB. Of these patients, 20 had undergone recent PPD tests in the last 6 months, of which nine were positive. The remaining 90 patients underwent PPD and delayed-type hypersensitivity skin tests (anergy panel); five patients were unavailable for follow-up. The patients also answered questions regarding human immunodeficiency virus status, risk factors for TB infection, and clinical symptoms.

Results
The mean age of the study group was 34 years (age range, 13 to 69 years). Eighty-four percent of these patients were males who belonged to the high-risk socioeconomic, racial, and ethnic groups (poor, non-white). The tests for 15 patients (17%) were newly discovered to be positive for PPD. Eleven percent of the patients with negative PPD tests were anergic, thus raising the percentage of patients with positive PPD tests to 20%. The human immunodeficiency virus status was known in only 41% of the total patients. All patients with positive PPD tests had a chest x-ray film performed; of these patients, positive findings for TB were determined for one patient. Another patient had evidence of abdominal TB at laparotomy. All patients with positive PPD tests were given appointments in the pulmonary clinic for follow-up, and only three of 15 patients kept their appointments.

Conclusions
Patients who were admitted to the trauma service were predominantly young males from high-risk groups with a high incidence of TB infection. Their admission to the trauma service was a unique opportunity for screening and implementing existing preventive programs.

(Arch Surg. 1995;130:1223-1227)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery (Drs Taneja and Livingston and Mss Merritt and Vanek) and Preventive Medicine and Community Health (Dr Passannante), University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey–New Jersey Medical School, Newark.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.