You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 12, December 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Primary vs secondary iliopsoas abscess. Presentation, microbiology, and treatment

R. O. Santaella, E. K. Fishman and P. A. Lipsett
Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To review the characteristics of patient presentation, microbiology, and treatment of primary iliopsoas abscess. DESIGN: A case series of patients with iliopsoas abscess diagnosed on computed tomographic scans from 1987 to 1994. SETTING: Tertiary care inner-city university hospital. PATIENTS: Eleven patients with secondary iliopsoas abscess, defined as being secondary to gastrointestinal or genitourinary causes or trauma, and seven patients with primary abscess, defined as the absence of the above causes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient characteristics, presenting symptoms and signs, microbiologic characteristics, treatment, and clinical course of patients with primary iliopsoas abscesses compared with those in patients with secondary abscesses. RESULTS: In the primary group, six patients (86%) were intravenous drug users and four (57%) were positive for human immunodeficiency virus. Staphylococcus aureus grew from cultures from five of seven patients with primary abscesses, whereas secondary abscesses had enteric flora. The typical patient presentation included fever, with complaints of pain in the flank, hip, or abdomen. Comparison of abscess drainage options showed shorter hospitalizations for surgical drainage than for percutaneous drainage (15.9 vs 28.5 days; P < or = .01). CONCLUSIONS: A patient who presents with pain in the flank, hip, or abdomen may have a primary iliopsoas abscess. Computed tomography is the standard method of diagnosis. Antibiotic regimens for patients with primary iliopsoas abscess should include coverage for S aureus, and patients with secondary abscesses should have antibiotic regimens tailored for enteric bacteria. Drainage of abscess is essential for appropriate treatment, and surgical drainage is superior to percutaneous drainage in achieving prompt recovery.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Bacterial, Fungal, Parasitic, and Viral Myositis
Crum-Cianflone
Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2008;21:473-494.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Painful haematuria following central venous catheter infection
Huang et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003;18:1223-1225.
FULL TEXT  

Abdominal pain after trauma in a young man
Postgrad. Med. J. 2001;77:606d-606.
FULL TEXT  

Aseptic psoas pyomyositis and erosive discitis in a case of calcium pyrophosphate crystal deposition disease
Dudler et al.
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2000;39:1290-1292.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.