You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 3, March 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Papers
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (62)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Common Bile Duct Exploration in the Era of Laparoscopic Surgery

Mark E. Stoker, MD

Arch Surg. 1995;130(3):265-269.


Abstract

Objective
To review the treatment and outcome of patients with common bile duct (CBD) stones who underwent cholecystecomy.

Design
Prospective series of 700 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomies, with a mean follow-up of 22 months.

Setting
University-affiliated community hospital.

Patients
Eighty patients with documented CBD stones during a 42-month period (July 1990 to January 1994).

Interventions
Laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) was performed with either choledochotomy and T tube (n=27) or transcystic duct choledochoscopy (n=33). Open CBDE (OCBDE) (n=16) and endoscopic sphincterotomy (n=16) were also employed.

Main Outcome Measures
Documented removal of CBD stones and procedure-related complications.

Results
Laparoscopic CBDE was successful in 60 (94%) of 64 attempted cases. Mean operating time was 149±40 minutes and length of hospital stay was 2.8±2.1 days. Six complications (10%) were recorded, including three retained stones (5%). In 11 of 16 patients undergoing OCBDE, CBD stones were discovered with intraoperative cholangiography after conversion to laparotomy was needed for completion of the cholecystectomy. One OCBDE was planned in a patient with suppurative cholangitis. Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy (n=11) was successful in four patients. Postoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy (n=5) was successful in four patients.

Conclusion
With a protocol of routine cholangiography, LCBDE, and selective use of OCBDE (when LCBDE is not possible), the reliance on a second procedure (endoscopic sphincterotomy) can be minimized. Laparoscopic CBDE, a technically demanding operation, is possible at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the majority of cases, with a low complication rate and a short length of hospital stay.

(Arch Surg. 1995;130:265-269)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, The Fallon Clinic, St Vincent Hospital and The University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Use of Holmium Laser Technology for the Treatment of Refractory Common Bile Duct Stones, With a Short Review of the Relevant Literature
Day et al.
SURG INNOV 2009;16:169-172.
ABSTRACT  

Ductal Stones: Pathology, Clinical Manifestations, Laparoscopic Extraction Techniques, and Complications
Cuschieri
SURG INNOV 2000;7:246-261.
ABSTRACT  

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Choledochoscopy
Wood and MacFadyen
SURG INNOV 2000;7:288-294.
ABSTRACT  

Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration: Long-term Outcome
Giurgiu et al.
Arch Surg 1999;134:839-844.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration: Practical Application
Ferguson
Arch Surg 1998;133:448-451.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Future Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones
Johnson and Hunter
SURG INNOV 1997;4:45-47.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.