You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 3, March 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Papers
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Aggressive Surgical Resection for Cholangiocarcinoma

W. Kenneth Washburn, MD; W. David Lewis, MD; Roger L. Jenkins, MD

Arch Surg. 1995;130(3):270-276.


Abstract

Objectives
To review the spectrum of cholangiocarcinoma in patients treated by a single team of hepatobiliary surgeons over an 8-year period, to evaluate the predictors of survival, and to assess the results of an aggressive approach to surgical resection.

Design
Retrospective review of all clinical records of patients referred for treatment of cholangiocarcinoma, with univariate analysis of clinical and pathologic factors in relation to patient survival.

Setting
New England Deaconess Hospital, Boston, Mass.

Patients
Eighty-eight consecutive patients referred with the established diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma, from December 31, 1985, to April 15, 1994.

Interventions
Seventy-five of 88 patients were treated surgically, with 59 undergoing major resection for cure. Of the 29 patients treated palliatively, 16 had operations and 13 had wire mesh stents placed nonoperatively.

Main Outcome Measures
Morbidity, mortality, and patient survival.

Results
Survival correlates directly with the pathologic stage (TNM). Tumor location had no impact on survival. Patients undergoing resection survived significantly longer (median, 23.2 months) than palliated patients (median, 7.7 months; P=.0015). Nonoperative palliation resulted in better survival than surgical palliation (P=.045). Major hepatic resection was used alone in eight patients with predominating intrahepatic lesions, while 18 patients with hilar lesions underwent en bloc skeletonization in conjunction with major hepatic resection. Resection with microscopically free margins significantly improved survival. Only patients undergoing major resection enjoyed survival greater than 2 years.

Conclusions
Patient survival can be significantly improved by aggressive surgical resection. Hepatic resection should be used aggressively to achieve disease-free margins to optimize survival. Hepatic resection can be performed with low morbidity and mortality. Liver transplantation should be avoided as a treatment for cholangiocarcinoma. The best palliation for unresectable disease remains debatable. We advocate nonoperative treatment with endobiliary expandable wire mesh stents for patients with unresectable disease.

(Arch Surg. 1995;130:270-276)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, New England Deaconess Hospital, Boston, Mass.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Early Bile Duct Carcinoma: Comparison of Imaging Features with Pathologic Findings
Lim et al.
Radiology 2006;238:542-548.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diagnosis and Treatment of Cholangiocarcinoma
Anderson et al.
The Oncologist 2004;9:43-57.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Role of Thymidine Phosphorylase and Thrombospondin-1 in Angiogenesis and Progression of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
Aishima et al.
INT J SURG PATHOL 2002;10:47-56.
ABSTRACT  

Surgical Treatment and Outcomes in Carcinoma of the Extrahepatic Bile Ducts: The University of Rochester Experience
Blom and Schwartz
Arch Surg 2001;136:209-214.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Major Liver Resection for Carcinoma in Jaundiced Patients Without Preoperative Biliary Drainage
Cherqui et al.
Arch Surg 2000;135:302-308.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Indications for referral and assessment in adultliver transplantation: a clinical guideline
Devlin and O'Grady
Gut 1999;45:VI1-22.
FULL TEXT  

Biliary Tract Cancers
de Groen et al.
NEJM 1999;341:1368-1378.
FULL TEXT  

Major Hepatic Resection: Indications and Results in a National Hospital System From 1988 to 1992
Nadig et al.
Arch Surg 1997;132:115-119.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.