You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 4, April 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Papers
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Changes in Intracranial Pressure Associated With Apneumic Retractors

Jaime R. Este-McDonald, MD; Leon G. Josephs, MD; Desmond H. Birkett, MD, FRCS; Erwin F. Hirsch, MD

Arch Surg. 1995;130(4):362-366.


Abstract

Objective
To investigate the effect of apneumic retraction on intracranial pressure (ICP) using a live porcine model.

Design
Five 25- to 30-kg pigs had a fiber-optic ICP bolt inserted under general endotracheal anesthesia and were monitored for ICP, mean arterial pressure, arterial blood gas measurements, and intra-abdominal pressure before, during, and after pneumoperitoneum, with each period 30 minutes long. These series of measurements were repeated after artificially raising ICP with an epidural balloon to create a head-injured model. The mean (±SE) ICP in the noninjured model at baseline was 13.46±1.01 mm Hg; during pneumoperitoneum, 18.72± 1.50 mm Hg (P=.0001). Similarly, in the head-injured model, ICP was raised artificially to a new baseline of 22 ± 1.75 mm Hg with an epidural balloon, and pneumoperitoneum increased ICP to 27.40±0.93 mm Hg (P=.0001). Pneumoperitoneum was then released, and an apneumic retractor was inserted while maintaining the inflated epidural balloon.

Main Outcome Measure
Changes in ICP.

Results
Applying anterior wall retraction equivalent to 20 mm Hg was not associated with changes in ICP. These observations were independent of any changes in arterial Pco2 or arterial pH. Following the release of pneumoperitoneum, abdominal wall retraction, and epidural balloon, all measurements reverted to baseline.

Conclusion
Pneumoperitoneum adversely affects ICP, while apneumic retraction may not affect animals with raised ICP. These findings suggest that pneumoperitoneum should be used with caution in patients with raised ICP, and apneumic retraction may be a safer alternative for laparoscopic evaluation in this population.

(Arch Surg. 1995;130:362-366)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Boston (Mass) University Medical Center.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Effects of Low-Pressure Carbon Dioxide Pneumoperitoneum on Cerebral Oxygenation and Cerebral Blood Volume in Children
de Waal et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2002;94:500-505.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Abdominal Wall Lift Systems in Laparoscopic Surgery: Gasless and Low-pressure Systems
Alijani and Cuschieri
SURG INNOV 2001;8:53-62.
ABSTRACT  

Changes in Intracranial Pressure Associated With Apneumic Retractors
Shapira et al.
Arch Surg 1996;131:1116-1116.
ABSTRACT  

The Role of Laparoscopy in the Intensive Care Unit
Flynn
SURG INNOV 1996;3:140-147.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.