You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 5, May 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Increases in intra-abdominal pressure affect pulmonary compliance

F. Obeid, A. Saba, J. Fath, B. Guslits, R. Chung, V. Sorensen, J. Buck and M. Horst
Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich, USA.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) on pulmonary compliance and to determine an effective means to measure IAP. DESIGN: A prospective study. SETTING: An urban tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-six adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. INTERVENTIONS: Intra-operative management of laparoscopic cholecystectomy requiring endotracheal intubation with general anesthesia, nasogastric and urinary bladder catheters, and position changes. Additional interventions included use of a rectal manometer and a respiratory pressure module inserted within the ventilator circuit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlation of changes in IAP with changes in dynamic pulmonary compliance, measured as tidal volume/(end inspiratory pressure--end expiratory pressure) and comparison of three different measurement techniques (bladder, rectal, and gastric) with a standard technique (insufflation pressure) in three different positions (supine, Trendelenburg's, and reverse Trendelenburg's). RESULTS: Compliance was significantly related to insufflation pressure (P < .001) by analysis of variance. In the gas insufflation model, the mean increment in bladder pressure reflected most closely the IAP increment in the supine position (5.7 vs 6 mm Hg) but not in the Trendelenburg (2.1 vs 6 mm Hg) and reverse Trendelenburg positions (3.4 vs 6 mm Hg). Rectal and gastric pressures were also position dependent and technically less reliable. CONCLUSIONS: Increased IAP has a major influence on pulmonary compliance (50% decrease at 16 mm Hg). Measurements of IAP by intraorgan manometry are position dependent and may not accurately reflect the intraperitoneal pressure.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Intra-abdominal pressure measurement: validation of intragastric pressure as a measure of intra-abdominal pressure
Turnbull et al.
Br J Anaesth 2007;98:628-634.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Changes in Breathing Control and Mechanics After Laparoscopic vs Open Cholecystectomy
Bablekos et al.
Arch Surg 2006;141:16-22.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Analytic Reviews : Acute Abdominal Compartment Syndrome in the Critically Ill: Saggi BH, Sugerman HJ, Ivatury RR, Bloomfield GL Acute abdominal compartment syndrome in the critically ill J Intensive Care Med 1999, 14,207-219
Saggi et al.
J Intensive Care Med 1999;14:207-219.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.