 |
 |

Successful Laparoscopic Repair of Paraesophageal Hernia
David E. Pitcher, MD;
Myriam J. Curet, MD;
Daniel T. Martin, MD;
Diana M. Vogt, MD;
MAJ John Mason, MC, USAF;
Karl A. Zucker, MD
Arch Surg. 1995;130(6):590-596.
Abstract
 |  |
Objective To evaluate prospectively the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgical techniques in the repair of types II and III paraesophageal hernias.
Design Case series.
Setting Tertiary-care, university-affiliated hospitals.
Patients Twelve consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic repair of type II or type III paraesophageal hernias. Patients were available for follow-up for I to 17 months postoperatively.
Interventions All patients underwent laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia reduction and repair. Eight patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease underwent concurrent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.
Main Outcome Measures Operative times, operative complications, and estimated blood loss were recorded. Postoperative outcome measurements included length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, postoperative gastrointestinal tract symptoms, and patient satisfaction.
Results All patients had successful completion of paraesophageal hernia repair laparoscopically with no recurrences, and with an overall minor morbidity rate of 25%, major morbidity rate of 8%, and no deaths. Eight of 12 patients with concomitant reflux disease underwent successful laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with complete control of reflux symptoms. The average hospital stay for patients with uncomplicated courses was 2.5 days. Long-term (>6 weeks) postfundoplication symptoms occurred in 13% of those patients who underwent fundoplication. Eleven (92%) of 12 patients described good to excellent results with complete or near complete control of all preoperative symptoms.
Conclusions Laparoscopic repair of types II and III paraesophageal hernias can be performed under elective circumstances by experienced laparoscopic surgeons, with acceptable morbidity and comparable short-term efficacy. Addition of a concomitant antireflux procedure should be reserved for those patients with clear preoperative evidence of reflux disease secondary to a mechanically defective lower esophageal sphincter. Patients with a normal lower esophageal antireflux barrier do not need a concomitant antireflux procedure.
(Arch Surg. 1995;130:590-596)
Author Affiliations
From The University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque (Drs Pitcher, Curt, Martin, Vogt, and Zucker), and the Albuquerque Federal Regional Medical Center (Drs Pitcher, Curet, Martin, Mason, and Zucker).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Mesh in the Hiatus: A Controversial Issue
Targarona et al.
Arch Surg 2004;139:1286-1296.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) Patch Repair vs Simple Cruroplasty for Large Hiatal Hernia
Frantzides et al.
Arch Surg 2002;137:649-652.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Laparoscopic Treatment of Large Hiatal Hernias
Cuesta et al.
SURG INNOV 1999;6:213-223.
ABSTRACT
Importance of Dissection of the Hernial Sac in Laparoscopic Surgery for Large Hiatal Hernias
Watson et al.
Arch Surg 1999;134:1069-1073.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Massive hiatus hernia: Evaluation and surgical management
Maziak et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1998;115:53-62.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair
Perdikis et al.
Arch Surg 1997;132:586-590.
ABSTRACT
|