You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 7, July 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Articles
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (55)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Resection of the Suprarenal Inferior Vena Cava

The Role of Prosthetic Replacement

Claude Huguet, MD; Mario Fern, MD; Adolfo Gavelli, MD

Arch Surg. 1995;130(7):793-797.


Abstract

Objective
To review the role of prosthetic replacement after resection of the suprarenal portion of the inferior vena cava (IVC).

Design
Retrospective review of a series of six patients with malignant infiltration of the suprarenal IVC undergoing operation in the last 11 years.

Setting
Multispecialty referral center.

Patients
One primary leiomyosarcoma and five involvements of the IVC by liver carcinoma (n=2), adrenal carcinoma (n=2), and recurrent renal carcinoma (n=1).

Interventions
En bloc resection of the tumor with the IVC under total vascular exclusion of the liver in four cases, combined major liver resection in four cases, venous resection including the renal confluence in four cases, prosthetic venous replacement in four cases, and no venous replacement in two cases.

Main Outcome Measures
Mortality, venous patency, clinical assessment, and malignant recurrence.

Results
One postoperative death (renal failure) following extended resection with right nephrectomy and ligature of the left renal vein. Graft patency was controlled in survivors, with good functional result. Among two patients without venous replacement, one with complete caval obstruction and marked collateral circulation has had a good result, and one with partial caval obstruction experienced transient symptoms of venous insufficiency. Malignant recurrence led to death in four patients (4, 6, 37, and 42 months after surgery).

Conclusions
Suprarenal IVC reconstruction is justified in selected cases, with good functional results. When the renal confluence is resected along with the IVC, renal vein reconstruction may be needed to avoid acute renal failure. The oncologic results of such extensive resections are poor. Adjuvant therapy should be evaluated.

(Arch Surg. 1995;130:793-797)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Princess Grace Hospital, Monaco, Principality of Monaco.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Prosthetic Replacement of the Infrahepatic Inferior Vena Cava for Leiomyosarcoma
Illuminati et al.
Arch Surg 2006;141:919-924.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Urgent inferior vena cava replacement with an autologous pericardium tube graft
Lam et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2004;126:2101-2103.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.