You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 8, August 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Pylorus-preserving Whipple resection for pancreatic cancer. Is it any better?

A. G. Patel, M. T. Toyama, A. M. Kusske, P. Alexander, S. W. Ashley and H. A. Reber
Department of Surgery, Sepulveda Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif., USA.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the short- and long-term morbidity and mortality rates of the standard Whipple pancreatoduodenectomy (SW) and its pylorus-preserving modification (PPW) in patients with malignant periampullary disease. DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review and quality of life assessment by telephone interview. SETTING: University medical center. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-seven patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (52 SW and 15 PPW) from June 1988 to January 1994. INTERVENTION: The SW and PPW. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operative features and short- and long-term complications were analyzed with respect to the type and stage of cancer and the kind of pancreatic resection. Mean follow-up was 32 months (range, 1 to 5 years). RESULTS: The operative mortality rate for all patients who had a pancreatic resection was 1.5%. The diagnoses in the PPW vs SW groups were pancreatic cancer (four vs 27 patients), ampullary cancer (six vs seven patients), duodenal cancer (zero vs six patients), and bile duct cancer (five vs one patient). Operative mortality rates (0% vs 1.55%) and operative times (2 minutes longer for SW) were similar. Delayed gastric emptying (61% vs 41%) was more common in the PPW group, resulting in a longer hospitalization (24 vs 18 days) and a greater cost in the PPW group (P = .04). In the PPW group, a mean of five lymph nodes was removed compared with 10 in the SW group (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: The data provided no evidence of any advantage for the PPW in patients with malignant periampullary tumors. We continue to advocate the SW for pancreatic cancer.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Understanding Clinical Issues in Postoperative Nutrition After Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Zgodzinski et al.
Nutr Clin Pract 2005;20:654-661.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is Pylorospasm a Cause of Delayed Gastric Emptying After Pylorus-Preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy?
Kim et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2005;12:222-227.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Complications after Pancreatoduodenectomy: Imaging and Imaging-guided Interventional Procedures
Gervais et al.
RadioGraphics 2001;21:673-690.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ten-Year Experience With 733 Pancreatic Resections: Changing Indications, Older Patients, and Decreasing Length of Hospitalization
Balcom IV et al.
Arch Surg 2001;136:391-398.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Decreasing Length of Stay After Pancreatoduodenectomy
Brooks et al.
Arch Surg 2000;135:823-830.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.