You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 8, August 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Papers
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (66)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Laparoscopic Splenectomy

The Initial Experience at University of California, San Francisco

Laurence F. Yee, MD; Samuel H. Carvajal, MD; Alfred A. de Lorimier, MD; Sean J. Mulvihill, MD

Arch Surg. 1995;130(8):874-879.


Abstract

Objective
To evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) at a single institution.

Design
Case control.

Setting
University teaching hospital.

Patients
The medical records of the initial 25 consecutive patients who underwent LS at a single institution were reviewed. For comparison, a control group of 25 patients undergoing open splenectomy (OS) matched for age, diagnosis, and splenic weight were also reviewed.

Main Outcome Measures
Data regarding operative time, blood loss, pathologic findings, complications, postoperative hospital stay, ileus duration, preoperative and postoperative hematocrit and platelet counts, blood and platelet transfusions, and hospital costs were collected.

Results
Twenty-five patients underwent attempted LS. Four procedures (16%) were converted to OS. Operative time averaged 3.3±0.2 hours for LS and 2.6±0.1 hours for OS (P=.001). In the LS group, a regular diet was tolerated 2.1±0.3 days after surgery (P<.001), and mean postoperative hospital stay was 5.1±0.6 days (P=.037), compared with 4.3±0.3 and 6.7±0.5 days, respectively, in the OS group. No differences were observed in blood loss, complication rate, transfusion requirement, or hospital cost.

Conclusions
Compared with OS, LS requires more operative time, is comparable in blood loss, transfusion requirement, complication rate, and cost, and appears to be superior in terms of return of bowel function and hospital stay.

(Arch Surg. 1995;130:874-879)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Laparoscopic Splenectomy for Malignant Diseases
Heniford et al.
SURG INNOV 2000;7:93-100.
ABSTRACT  

Present Status of Laparoscopic Splenectomy for Hematologic Diseases: Certitudes and Unresolved Issues
Gigot et al.
SURG INNOV 1998;5:147-167.
ABSTRACT  

Residual Splenic Function After Laparoscopic Splenectomy: A Clinical Concern
Targarona et al.
Arch Surg 1998;133:56-60.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Complications of Laparoscopic Splenectomy
Navarro et al.
SURG INNOV 1997;4:182-189.
ABSTRACT  

Elective Laparoscopic Splenectomy: Personal Experience and Literature Review
Gigot et al.
SURG INNOV 1996;3:34-43.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.