You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 8, August 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Laparoscopic splenectomy. The initial experience at University of California, San Francisco

L. F. Yee, S. H. Carvajal, A. A. de Lorimier and S. J. Mulvihill
Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) at a single institution. DESIGN: Case control. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENTS: The medical records of the initial 25 consecutive patients who underwent LS at a single institution were reviewed. For comparison, a control group of 25 patients undergoing open splenectomy (OS) matched for age, diagnosis, and splenic weight were also reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data regarding operative time, blood loss, pathologic findings, complications, postoperative hospital stay, ileus duration, preoperative and postoperative hematocrit and platelet counts, blood and platelet transfusions, and hospital costs were collected. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients underwent attempted LS. Four procedures (16%) were converted to OS. Operative time averaged 3.3 +/- 0.2 hours for LS and 2.6 +/- 0.1 hours for OS (P = .001). In the LS group, a regular diet was tolerated 2.1 +/- 0.3 days after surgery (P < .001), and mean postoperative hospital stay was 5.1 +/- 0.6 days (P = .037), compared with 4.3 +/- 0.3 and 6.7 +/- 0.5 days, respectively, in the OS group. No differences were observed in blood loss, complication rate, transfusion requirement, or hospital cost. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with OS, LS requires more operative time, is comparable in blood loss, transfusion requirement, complication rate, and cost, and appears to be superior in terms of return of bowel function and hospital stay.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Residual Splenic Function After Laparoscopic Splenectomy: A Clinical Concern
Targarona et al.
Arch Surg 1998;133:56-60.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.